The Temporal Dimension of Knowledge and the Limits of Policy Appraisal: Biofuels Policy in the UK

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

The Temporal Dimension of Knowledge and the Limits of Policy Appraisal: Biofuels Policy in the UK

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dunlop, Claire A en_GB
dc.date.accessioned 2009-12-10T13:46:05Z en_GB
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-25T11:44:09Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-03-20T16:29:37Z
dc.date.issued 2010 en_GB
dc.description.abstract What depth of learning can policy appraisal stimulate? How we can account for the survival policies that are known to pose significant countervailing risks? While heralded as a panacea to the inherent ambiguity of the political world, the proposition pursued is that policy appraisal processes intended to help decision-makers learn may actually be counterproductive. Rather than simulating policy-oriented learning, appraisals may reduce policy actors’ capacity to think clearly about the policy at hand. By encouraging a variety of epistemic inputs from a plurality of sources and shoehorning knowledge development into a specified timeframe, policy appraisal may leave decision-makers overloaded with conflicting information and evidence which dates rapidly. In such circumstances, they to fall back on institutionalised ways of thinking even when confronted with evidence of significant mismatches between policy objectives and the consequences of the planned course of action. Here learning is ‘single-loop’ rather than ‘double-loop’—focussed on adjustments in policy strategy rather than re-thinking the underlying policy goals. Using insights into new institutional economics, the paper explores how the results of policy appraisals in technically complex issues are mediated by institutionalised ‘rules of the game’ which feed back positively around initial policy frames and early interpretations of what constitutes policy success. Empirical evidence from UK biofuels policy appraisal confirms the usefulness of accounts that attend to the temporal tensions that exist between policy and knowledge development. Adopting an institutional approach that emphasises path dependence does not however preclude the possibility that the depth of decision-makers’ learning might change. Rather, the biofuels case suggests that moves towards deeper learning may be affected by reviews of appraisal evidence led by actors beyond immediate organizational context with Chief Scientific Advisers within government emerging as potentially powerful catalysts in this acquisition of learning capabilities. en_GB
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11077-009-9101-7 en_GB
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10036/87784 en_GB
dc.language.iso en_US en_GB
dc.publisher Springer en_GB
dc.relation.url http://www.springerlink.com/content/u7qg222240ukk613/ en_GB
dc.subject Biofuels en_GB
dc.subject Chief Scientific Advisers en_GB
dc.subject Learning en_GB
dc.subject New institutional economics en_GB
dc.subject Policy appraisal en_GB
dc.subject Positive en_GB
dc.subject Time en_GB
dc.title The Temporal Dimension of Knowledge and the Limits of Policy Appraisal: Biofuels Policy in the UK en_GB
dc.type Article en_GB
dc.date.available 2009-12-10T13:46:05Z en_GB
dc.date.available 2011-01-25T11:44:09Z en_US
dc.date.available 2013-03-20T16:29:37Z
dc.description © Springer 2009 en_GB
dc.identifier.journal Policy Sciences en_GB


Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
dunlop_temporal_dimension.pdf 337.1Kb PDF View/Open Preprint

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account

Local Links