Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChalk, Danielen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-13T16:15:42Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T17:13:14Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-21T11:42:04Z
dc.date.issued2009-12-17en_GB
dc.description.abstractBumble bees (bombus spp.) are significant pollinators of many plants, and are particularly attracted to mass-flowering crops such as Oilseed Rape (Brassica Napus), which they cross-pollinate. B. napus is both wind and insect-pollinated, and whilst it has been found that wind is its most significant pollen vector, the influence of bumble bee pollination could be non-trivial when bee densities are large. Therefore, the assessment of pollinator-mediated cross-pollination events could be important when considering containment strategies of genetically modified (GM) crops, such as GM varieties of B. napus, but requires a landscape-scale understanding of pollinator movements, which is currently unknown for bumble bees. I developed an in silico model, entitled HARVEST, which simulates the foraging and consequential inter-patch movements of bumble bees. The model is based on principles from Reinforcement Learning and Individual Based Modelling, and uses a Linear Operator Learning Rule to guide agent learning. The model incoproates one or more agents, or bees, that learn by ‘trial-and-error’, with a gradual preference shown for patch choice actions that provide increased rewards. To validate the model, I verified its ability to replicate certain iconic patterns of bee-mediated gene flow, and assessed its accuracy in predicting the flower visits and inter-patch movement frequencies of real bees in a small-scale system. The model successfully replicated the iconic patterns, but failed to accurately predict outputs from the real system. It did, however, qualitatively replicate the high levels of inter-patch traffic found in the real small-scale system, and its quantitative discrepancies could likely be explained by inaccurate parameterisations. I also found that HARVEST bees are extremely efficient foragers, which agrees with evidence of powerful learning capabilities and risk-aversion in real bumble bees. When applying the model to the landscape-scale, HARVEST predicts that overall levels of bee-mediated gene flow are extremely low. Nonetheless, I identified an effective containment strategy in which a ‘shield’ comprised of sacrificed crops is placed between GM and conventional crop populations. This strategy could be useful for scenarios in which the tolerance for GM seed set is exceptionally low.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBBSRCen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberBBS/Q/Q/2004/05894en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/96455en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.subjectForagingen_GB
dc.subjectBumble beesen_GB
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligenceen_GB
dc.subjectReinforcement learningen_GB
dc.subjectGene flowen_GB
dc.subjectGM cropsen_GB
dc.subjectHARVESTen_GB
dc.subjectOptimal Foraging Theoryen_GB
dc.subjectAnimal behaviouren_GB
dc.titleArtificially Intelligent Foragingen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2010-04-13T16:15:42Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T17:13:14Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-21T11:42:04Z
dc.contributor.advisorCresswell, Jamesen_GB
dc.contributor.advisorEverson, Richarden_GB
dc.publisher.departmentBiosciencesen_GB
dc.type.degreetitlePhD in Biological Sciencesen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnamePhDen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record