Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorParker, D
dc.contributor.authorByng, R
dc.contributor.authorDickens, C
dc.contributor.authorKinsey, D
dc.contributor.authorMcCabe, R
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-04T15:05:46Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-22
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In the UK, general practitioners (GPs) are the most commonly used providers of care for emotional concerns. OBJECTIVE: To update and synthesize literature on barriers and facilitators to GP-patient communication about emotional concerns in UK primary care. DESIGN: Systematic review and qualitative synthesis. METHOD: We conducted a systematic search on MEDLINE (OvidSP), PsycInfo and EMBASE, supplemented by citation chasing. Eligible papers focused on how GPs and adult patients in the UK communicated about emotional concerns. Results were synthesized using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Across 30 studies involving 342 GPs and 720 patients, four themes relating to barriers were: (i) emotional concerns are difficult to disclose; (ii) tension between understanding emotional concerns as a medical condition or arising from social stressors; (iii) unspoken assumptions about agency resulting in too little or too much involvement in decisions and (iv) providing limited care driven by little time. Three facilitative themes were: (v) a human connection improves identification of emotional concerns and is therapeutic; (vi) exploring, explaining and negotiating a shared understanding or guiding patients towards new understandings and (vii) upfront information provision and involvement manages expectations about recovery and improves engagement in treatment. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that treatment guidelines should acknowledge: the therapeutic value of a positive GP-patient relationship; that diagnosis is a two-way negotiated process rather than an activity strictly in the doctor's domain of expertise; and the value of exploring and shaping new understandings about patients' emotional concerns and their management.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipJudi Meadows Memorial Funden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeter Medical Schoolen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 22-January-2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/fampra/cmaa002
dc.identifier.other5714005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/120159
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31967300en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.comen_GB
dc.subjectCommunicationen_GB
dc.subjectemotionsen_GB
dc.subjectmental healthen_GB
dc.subjectprimary careen_GB
dc.subjectprofessional–patient relationsen_GB
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_GB
dc.titleBarriers and facilitators to GP-patient communication about emotional concerns in UK primary care: a systematic review.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-03-04T15:05:46Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from OUP via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.journalFamily Practiceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-01-22
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-03-04T14:45:34Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-04T15:05:51Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record