Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorConnelly, R
dc.contributor.authorGayle, V
dc.contributor.authorPlayford, C
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-14T12:03:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-23
dc.description.abstractThere is increasing concern across a wide range of academic disciplines that empirical results cannot be reproduced because of a lack of transparency in the research process (Baker, 2016). Over the last decade there has been increasing anxiety that it is impossible to verify the results presented in many research papers (Christensen, Freese, & Miguel, 2019). There is a growing interest in the need for researchers to provide additional materials alongside traditional publications to enable other researchers to understand, evaluate and build upon previous research work. The purpose of these materials is to provide sufficient information for a third party, that is unconnected with the original work, to reproduce results without any additional information being provided by the original authors. The focus of this entry is social science research that employs statistical techniques to analyse observational data (e.g. social surveys). Many of the issues associated with undertaking transparent and reproducible data analysis pervade other forms of social science research (e.g. qualitative data analysis), despite the different nature of the data and the analytical techniques that are used.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationIn: SAGE Research Methods Foundations, edited by P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J.W. Sakshaug, & R.A. Williamsen_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.4135/9781526421036926480
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/121041
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publishingen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 23 September 2022 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2020 SAGE Publishing
dc.titleTransparent and Reproducible Data Analysisen_GB
dc.typeBook chapteren_GB
dc.date.available2020-05-14T12:03:27Z
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from SAGE Publishing via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionNote that the title and abstract of the author accepted manuscript are slightly different from the published version
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-02-18
exeter.funder::Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-02-18
rioxxterms.typeBook chapteren_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-05-14T08:33:35Z
refterms.versionFCDAM


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record