Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOwen, C
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-09T08:47:27Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-20
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the way in which Russian and Chinese governments have rearticulated global trends towards active citizenship and participatory governance, and integrated them into preexisting illiberal political traditions. The concept of ‘participatory authoritarianism’ is proposed in order to capture the resulting practices of local governance that, on the one hand enable citizens to engage directly with local officials in the policy process, but limit, direct and control civic participation on the other. The article explores the emergence of discourses of active citizenship at the national level and the accompanying legislative development of government-organised participatory mechanisms, demonstrating how the twin logics of openness and control, pluralism and monism, are built into their rationale and implementation. It argues that as state bureaucracies have integrated into international financial markets, so new participatory mechanisms have become more important for local governance as government agencies have lost the monopoly of information for effective policy-making. Practices of participatory authoritarianism enable governments to implement public sector reform while directing increased civic agency into non-threatening channels.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Academyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 7 July 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0260210520000248
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/121331
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP) for British International Studies Associationen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British International Studies Association
dc.subjectAuthoritarianismen_GB
dc.subjectparticipationen_GB
dc.subjectRussiaen_GB
dc.subjectChinaen_GB
dc.subjectgood governanceen_GB
dc.subjectpublic sector reformen_GB
dc.titleParticipatory authoritarianism: From bureaucratic transformation to civic participation in Russia and Chinaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-06-09T08:47:27Z
dc.identifier.issn0260-2105
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalReview of International Studiesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-06-08
exeter.funder::British Academyen_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-06-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-06-08T15:33:10Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-08-14T12:37:48Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record