Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLi, W
dc.contributor.authorCiais, P
dc.contributor.authorStehfest, E
dc.contributor.authorVan Vuuren, D
dc.contributor.authorPopp, A
dc.contributor.authorArneth, A
dc.contributor.authorDi Fulvio, F
dc.contributor.authorDoelman, J
dc.contributor.authorHumpenöder, F
dc.contributor.authorB Harper, A
dc.contributor.authorPark, T
dc.contributor.authorMakowski, D
dc.contributor.authorHavlik, P
dc.contributor.authorObersteiner, M
dc.contributor.authorWang, J
dc.contributor.authorKrause, A
dc.contributor.authorLiu, W
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-12T15:38:00Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-02
dc.description.abstractMost scenarios from integrated assessment models (IAMs) that project greenhouse gas emissions include the use of bioenergy as a means to reduce CO2 emissions or even to achieve negative emissions (together with CCS carbon capture and storage). The potential amount of CO2 that can be removed from the atmosphere depends, among others, on the yields of bioenergy crops, the land available to grow these crops and the efficiency with which CO2 produced by combustion is captured. While bioenergy crop yields can be simulated by models, estimates of the spatial distribution of bioenergy yields under current technology based on a large number of observations are currently lacking. In this study, a random-forest (RF) algorithm is used to upscale a bioenergy yield dataset of 3963 observations covering Miscanthus, switchgrass, eucalypt, poplar and willow using climatic and soil conditions as explanatory variables. The results are global yield maps of five important lignocellulosic bioenergy crops under current technology, climate and atmospheric CO2 conditions at a 0:5 0:5 spatial resolution. We also provide a combined "best bioenergy crop" yield map by selecting one of the five crop types with the highest yield in each of the grid cells, eucalypt and Miscanthus in most cases. The global median yield of the best crop is 16.3 tDMha1 yr1 (DM dry matter). High yields mainly occur in the Amazon region and southeastern Asia. We further compare our empirically derived maps with yield maps used in three IAMs and find that the median yields in our maps are 50% higher than those in the IAM maps. Our estimates of gridded bioenergy crop yields can be used to provide bioenergy yields for IAMs, to evaluate land surface models or to identify the most suitable lands for future bioenergy crop plantations. The 0:5 0:5 global maps for yields of different bioenergy crops and the best crop and for the best crop composition generated from this study can be download from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3274254 (Li, 2019).en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 12, pp. 789 - 804en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/essd-12-789-2020
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/N030141/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/P019951/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/121408
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCopernicus Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.en_GB
dc.titleMapping the yields of lignocellulosic bioenergy crops from observations at the global scaleen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-06-12T15:38:00Z
dc.identifier.issn1866-3508
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Copernicus Publications via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1866-3516
dc.identifier.journalEarth System Science Dataen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-02-25
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-04-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-06-12T15:33:44Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-06-12T15:38:05Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.