Four Cultural Narratives for Managing Social-ecological Complexity in Public Natural Resource Management
dc.contributor.author | Kirsop-Taylor, NA | |
dc.contributor.author | Hejnowicz, AP | |
dc.contributor.author | Scott, K | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-14T13:51:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-07-07 | |
dc.description.abstract | Public Natural Resource Management (NRM) agencies operate in complex social-ecological domains. These complexities proliferate unpredictably therefore investigating and supporting the ability of public agencies to respond effectively is increasingly important. However, understanding how public NRM agencies innovate and restructure to negotiate the range of particular complexities they face is an under researched field. One particular conceptualisation of the social-ecological complexities facing NRM agencies that is of growing influence is the Water-Energy-Food (WEF) nexus. Yet, as a tool to frame and understand those complexities it has limitations. Specifically, it overlooks how NRMs respond institutionally to these social-ecological complexities in the context of economic and organisational challenges-thus creating a gap in the literature. Current debates in public administration can be brought to bear here. Using an organisational cultures approach, this paper reports on a case study with a national NRM agency to investigate how they are attempting to transform institutionally to respond to complexity in challenging times. The research involved 12 elite interviews with senior leaders from Natural Resources Wales, (NRW) and investigated how cultural narratives are being explicitly and implicitly constructed and mobilised to this end. The research identified four distinct and sequential cultural narratives: collaboration, communication, trust, and empowerment where each narrative supported the delivery of different dimensions of NRW's social-ecological complexity mandate. Counter to the current managerialist approaches in public administration, these results suggest that the empowerment of expert bureaucrats is important in responding effectively to complexity. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Resources Wales | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 7 July 2020 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00267-020-01320-6 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | ES/N012550/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/121933 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632498 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Culture | en_GB |
dc.subject | Environment | en_GB |
dc.subject | Organisation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Public agency | en_GB |
dc.subject | Social-ecological complexity | en_GB |
dc.subject | Water–Energy–Food nexus | en_GB |
dc.title | Four Cultural Narratives for Managing Social-ecological Complexity in Public Natural Resource Management | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-14T13:51:15Z | |
exeter.place-of-publication | United States | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Springer via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data availability: The data that comprised this research is stored at the UK Data Service but safeguarded due to its sensitive nature. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1432-1009 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Environmental Management | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-06-15 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-07-07 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2020-07-14T13:48:28Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-07-14T13:51:19Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,
adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as
long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the
source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if
changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless
indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not
included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended
use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted
use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright
holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.