Active Citizens in a Weak State: ‘Self-Help’ Groups and the Post-Soviet Neoliberal Subject in Contemporary Kyrgyzstan
Owen, C
Date: 6 August 2020
Journal
Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies
Publisher
Taylor and Francis / Shanghai International Studies University
Publisher DOI
Abstract
This article explores the new political subjectivities that are emerging in disadvantaged
communities in Kyrgyzstan following post-Soviet state transformation and retreat. It explores
the ways in which the collapse of the Soviet-era bureaucracy and emergence of a marketizing
yet rent-seeking state bureaucracy has facilitated the ...
This article explores the new political subjectivities that are emerging in disadvantaged
communities in Kyrgyzstan following post-Soviet state transformation and retreat. It explores
the ways in which the collapse of the Soviet-era bureaucracy and emergence of a marketizing
yet rent-seeking state bureaucracy has facilitated the emergence of ‘active citizens’ in self-built
shanty towns in two locations in Kyrgyzstan – the capital, Bishkek, and the Issyk Kul resort
region in the east. Based on participant observation and research interviews with members of
so-called ‘self-help groups’ in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan, in which residents co-organise to lobby
local government for basic amenities and pool funds to raise money for community
infrastructure and services in the absence of a functioning state, the chapter makes two
contributions to understanding the nature of citizenship in the context of weak, post-Soviet
states. First, it suggests that, rather than seeing self-organised citizens as a threat to stability –
a perspective common to non-liberal governments – these initiatives are supported and
encouraged by the Kyrgyz authorities, since they perform tasks and provide services in lieu of
the weak state. Autonomous citizens who can take responsibility for their own welfare are
useful when the state cannot provide adequate services. Hence, leaders of weak states are able
to recontextualise global neoliberal discourses of active citizenship, which emphasise
autonomous, rational citizens, in order to legitimise their functional inabilities. Second, it seeks
to problematise the binary distinction between the ‘passive Soviet citizen’ and the modern,
post-Soviet active citizen, evident in government and international NGO discourses, and
suggests that that the idea of the ‘passive Soviet citizen’ is a discursive trope utilised to
distinguish desirable from undesirable subjectivity in the post-Soviet market state.
Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy, and Anthropology
Faculty of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0