Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDooley, E
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T08:28:33Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-22
dc.description.abstractFarmer discussion groups (FDGs) are a collaborative mechanism through which farmers can engage and learn from and with their peers. Participants cite numerous benefits from FDGs, e.g., economic, social, etc., but how learning happens in these contexts from an adult cognitive learning theory perspective is not well understood. Thus, Bandura’s social learning theory was used to study seven FDGs in the South West of England. The objective was to determine whether social learning was occurring through the FDGs’ interactions, examined according to three elements: (1) behaviour modelling, (2) role modelling and (3) self-reflexivity. An ethnographic methodology was utilised to gather rich empirical data through participant observation of 42 meetings and 24 semi-structured interviews. The results from 12 months attending FDG meetings demonstrated that behaviour modelling and role modelling were present in all FDGs. Self-reflexivity, however, was not evidenced as being promoted by all groups’ interactions, which (facilitated) critical discourse amongst the FDG participants was found to foster. Thus, evidence of social learning was not found to be occurring as a result of all the FDGs’ interactions. Collaborative learning processes that aim to promote social learning should build participants’ capacity and skills, structure engagement and train facilitators to foster critical discourse that may help promote self-reflexivity from behaviour modelling and role modelling.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 12 (18), article 7808en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su12187808
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/122975
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherMDPIen_GB
dc.rights© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectfarmer discussion groupen_GB
dc.subjectsocial learningen_GB
dc.subjectcollaborativeen_GB
dc.subjectpeer-to-peeren_GB
dc.subjectBanduraen_GB
dc.subjectself-reflexivityen_GB
dc.subjectcritical discourseen_GB
dc.subjectfacilitationen_GB
dc.titleAn Ethnographic Look into Farmer Discussion Groups through the Lens of Social Learning Theoryen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-09-24T08:28:33Z
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from MDPI via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalSustainabilityen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-14
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-09-22
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-09-23T15:51:57Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-24T08:28:40Z
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).