Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHorvath, L
dc.contributor.authorBanducci, S
dc.contributor.authorJames, O
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-25T08:43:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-09-02
dc.description.abstractCitizens’ concerns about data privacy and data security breaches may reduce adoption of COVID-19 contact tracing mobile phone applications, making them less effective. We implement a choice experiment (conjoint experiment) where participants indicate which version of two contact tracing apps they would install, varying the apps’ privacy-preserving attributes. Citizens do not always prioritize privacy and prefer a centralised National Health Service system over a decentralised system. In a further study asking about participants’ preference for digital vs human-only contact tracing, we find a mixture of digital and human contact tracing is supported. We randomly allocated a subset of participants in each study to receive a stimulus priming data breach as a concern, before asking about contact tracing. Salient threat of unauthorised access or data theft does not significantly alter preferences in either study. We suggest COVID-19 and trust in a national public health service system mitigate respondents’ concerns about privacy.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAlan Turing Institute, UKen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 2 September 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/xps.2020.30
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/R005133/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/122987
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KVKGUBen_GB
dc.rights© The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2020en_GB
dc.titleCitizens’ Attitudes to Contact Tracing Appsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-09-25T08:43:49Z
dc.identifier.issn2052-2630
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The data, code, and any additional materials required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at: doi: 10.7910/DVN/KVKGUBen_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Experimental Political Scienceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
exeter.funder::Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-08-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-09-25T08:31:28Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-25T08:43:58Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record