Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorQin, X
dc.contributor.authorOwen, C
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-12T08:50:23Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-22
dc.description.abstractThis article interrogates the operating logic of China’s street-level regulatory state, demonstrating that Residents’ Committees (RCs) assume a role as regulatory intermediaries to enhance the efficiency of local governance. Using Shanghai’s new recycling regulations as a case study, it explores the mechanisms by which RCs elicit not only citizens’ compliance but also active participation. We show that the central mechanisms derive from RCs’ skilful mobilisation of the social forces, namely mianzi and guanxi, that are produced within close-knit social networks inside Shanghai’s housing estates (xiaoqu). We advance three arguments in the study of China's emerging regulatory state. First, we show how informal social forces are employed in regulatory governance at the street level, combine authoritarian control with grass-roots participation. Second, the focus on RCs as regulatory intermediaries reveals the important role played by these street-level administrative units play in policy implementation. Third, we suggest that the RC’s harnessing of informal social forces is essential not only for the successful policy implementation at the street level, but also for the production of the local state’s political legitimacy.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Academyen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipChina National Social Science Funden_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 22 March 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0305741021000114
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/123190
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP) / School of Oriental and African Studiesen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectSocial forcesen_GB
dc.subjectrecyclingen_GB
dc.subjectChinaen_GB
dc.subjectcomplianceen_GB
dc.subjectparticipationen_GB
dc.subjectregulatory intermediariesen_GB
dc.titleSocial Forces and Street-level Governance in Shanghai: From Compliance to Participation in Recycling Regulationsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-10-12T08:50:23Z
dc.identifier.issn0305-7410
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalThe China Quarterlyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/  en_GB
exeter.funder::British Academyen_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-03-22
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-10-10T15:45:38Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-05-05T13:39:29Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.