Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBell, V
dc.contributor.authorRaihani, N
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, S
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T11:51:45Z
dc.date.issued2020-11-20
dc.description.abstractBecause of the traditional conceptualization of delusion as “irrational belief,” cognitive models of delusions largely focus on impairments to domain-general reasoning. Nevertheless, current rationality-impairment models do not account for the fact that (a) equivalently irrational beliefs can be induced through adaptive social cognitive processes, reflecting social integration rather than impairment; (b) delusions are overwhelmingly socially themed; and (c) delusions show a reduced sensitivity to social context both in terms of how they are shaped and how they are communicated. Consequently, we argue that models of delusions need to include alteration to coalitional cognition—processes involved in affiliation, group perception, and the strategic management of relationships. This approach has the advantage of better accounting for both content (social themes) and form (fixity) of delusion. It is also supported by the established role of mesolimbic dopamine in both delusions and social organization and the ongoing reconceptualization of belief as serving a social organizational function.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Society
dc.identifier.citationVol. 9, No.1, pp. 24 - 37en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/2167702620951553
dc.identifier.grantnumber200589/Z/16/Zen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/124815
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publications / Association for Psychological Scienceen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).en_GB
dc.subjectdelusionen_GB
dc.subjectpsychosisen_GB
dc.subjectschizophreniaen_GB
dc.subjectbeliefen_GB
dc.titleDerationalizing delusionsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-02-19T11:51:45Z
dc.identifier.issn2167-7026
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this record en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2167-7034
dc.identifier.journalClinical Psychological Scienceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-11-20
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-02-19T11:42:57Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-02-19T11:51:50Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).