Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeers, F
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, P
dc.contributor.authorAbel, SJ
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, PA
dc.contributor.authorBower, KN
dc.contributor.authorCotterell, MI
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, I
dc.contributor.authorDavies, NW
dc.contributor.authorFox, C
dc.contributor.authorFox, S
dc.contributor.authorLangridge, JM
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, KG
dc.contributor.authorPlatnick, SE
dc.contributor.authorSzpek, K
dc.contributor.authorHaywood, JM
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T12:35:42Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-03
dc.description.abstractTo evaluate the SEVIRI retrieval for aerosols above clouds presented in Part 1 of the companion paper, the algorithm is applied over the south-east Atlantic Ocean during the CLARIFY-2017 field campaign period. The first step of our analysis compares the retrieved aerosol and cloud properties against equivalent products from the MODIS MOD06ACAERO retrieval (Meyer et al., 2015). While the correlation between the two satellite retrievals of the above-cloud aerosol optical thickness (AOT) is good (R = 0.78), the AOT retrieved by SEVIRI is 20.3 % smaller than that obtained from the MODIS retrieval. This difference in AOT is attributed mainly to the more absorbing aerosol model assumed for the SEVIRI retrieval compared to MODIS. The underlying cloud optical thickness (COT) derived from the two satellites is in good agreement (R = 0.90). The cloud droplet effective radius (CER) retrieved by SEVIRI is consistently smaller than MODIS by 2.2 µm, which is mainly caused by the use of different spectral bands of the satellite instruments. In the second part of our analysis, we compare the forecast water vapour profiles used for the SEVIRI atmospheric correction as well as the aforementioned aerosol and cloud products with in situ measurements made from the Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM) aircraft platform during the CLARIFY-2017 campaign. Around Ascension Island, the column water vapour used to correct the SEVIRI signal is overestimated by 3.1 mm in the forecast compared to that measured by dropsondes. However, the evidence suggests that the accuracy of the atmospheric correction improves closer to the African coast. Consistency is observed between the SEVIRI above-cloud AOT and in situ measurements (from cavity ring-down spectroscopy instruments) when the measured single-scattering albedo is close to that assumed in the retrieval algorithm. On the other hand, the satellite retrieval overestimates the AOT when the assumed aerosol model is not absorbing enough. Consistency is also found between the cloud properties retrieved by SEVIRI and the CER measured by a cloud droplet probe and the liquid water path derived from a microwave radiometer. Despite the instrumental limitations of the geostationary satellite, the consistency obtained between SEVIRI, MODIS and the aircraft measurements demonstrates the ability of the retrieval in providing additional information on the temporal evolution of the aerosol properties above clouds.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Council of Norwayen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 21, pp. 3235–3254en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/acp-21-3235-2021
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/L013479/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber240372en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber244141en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/125005
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Union / Copernicus Publicationsen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/faam/data/en_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) 2021. open access. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.titleObservation of absorbing aerosols above clouds over the South-East Atlantic Ocean from the geostationary satellite SEVIRI – Part 2: Comparison with MODIS and aircraft measurements from the CLARIFY-2017 field campaignen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-03-04T12:35:42Z
dc.identifier.issn1680-7316
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Copernicus Publications via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The SEVIRI data used for this study are available from the corresponding author, Fanny Peers, upon reasonable request. MODIS above-cloud data products are available from Kerry G. Meyer (kerry.meyer@nasa.gov) upon request. The FAAM aircraft data are available at the Centre for Environmental Data Analysis from http://data.ceda.ac.uk/badc/faam/data/ (CEDA, 2021).en_GB
dc.identifier.journalAtmospheric Chemistry and Physicsen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-12-08
exeter.funder::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
exeter.funder::Cicero Senter Klimaforskning Stiftelseen_GB
exeter.funder::Cicero Senter Klimaforskning Stiftelseen_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-12-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-02-03T15:39:45Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-03-04T12:36:03Z
refterms.panelBen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) 2021. open access. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) 2021. open access. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/