Mixture models as a method for comparative sociality: social networks and demographic change in resident killer whales
dc.contributor.author | Ellis, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Franks, DW | |
dc.contributor.author | Weiss, MN | |
dc.contributor.author | Cant, MA | |
dc.contributor.author | Domenici, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Balcomb, KC | |
dc.contributor.author | Ellifrit, DK | |
dc.contributor.author | Croft, DP | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-08T06:53:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04-05 | |
dc.description.abstract | In studies of social behaviour, social bonds are usually inferred from rates of interaction or association. This approach has revealed many important insights into the proximate formation and ultimate function of animal social structures. However, it remains challenging to compare social structure between systems or time-points because extrinsic factors, such as sampling methodology, can also influence the observed rate of association. As a consequence of these methodological challenges, it is difficult to analyse how patterns of social association change with demographic processes, such as the death of key social partners. Here we develop and illustrate the use of binomial mixture models to quantitatively compare patterns of social association between networks. We then use this method to investigate how patterns of social preferences in killer whales respond to demographic change. Resident killer whales are bisexually philopatric, and both sexes stay in close association with their mother in adulthood. We show that mothers and daughters show reduced social association after the birth of the daughter’s first offspring, but not after the birth of an offspring to the mother. We also show that whales whose mother is dead associate more with their opposite sex siblings and with their grandmother than whales whose mother is alive. Our work demonstrates the utility of using mixture models to compare social preferences between networks and between species. We also highlight other potential uses of this method such as to identify strong social bonds in animal populations. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Leverhulme Trust | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 75, article 75 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00265-021-03006-3 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | ECF-2019-225 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NE/S010327/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/125296 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.subject | Social network | en_GB |
dc.subject | Social structure | en_GB |
dc.subject | Social bonds | en_GB |
dc.subject | Social network methods | en_GB |
dc.subject | Killer whales | en_GB |
dc.subject | Orcinus orca | en_GB |
dc.title | Mixture models as a method for comparative sociality: social networks and demographic change in resident killer whales | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-04-08T06:53:58Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0340-5443 | |
exeter.article-number | 75 | en_GB |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Springer via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-03-09 | |
exeter.funder | ::Leverhulme Trust | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-04-05 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-04-08T06:52:40Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-04-08T06:54:02Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/