Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilson-Kovacs, D
dc.contributor.authorRappert, B
dc.contributor.authorRedfern, L
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-01T14:25:19Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-21
dc.description.abstractMore than 80% of the work undertaken by digital forensics examiners deals with images of sexual abuse of children. While a growing body of literature analyses the emotional dimensions of coping with such material and the need to minimise exposure to it, less attention has been given to the day-to-day organisational arrangements in which such images are processed. Using ethnographic observations and interviews with practitioners, police officers and senior managers in four constabularies in England, this article examines the tension-ridden place for managing extensive contact with indecent images of children and argues that despite handling of transgressive material, digital forensic examiners distance themselves from imputations of being ‘dirty’ workers.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Academyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 21 June 2021en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjc/azab055
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/R00742X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberSG170548en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/125903
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Press / Centre for Crime and Justice Studiesen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectdigital forensicsen_GB
dc.subjectpoliceen_GB
dc.subjectindecent images of childrenen_GB
dc.subjectvirtual dirten_GB
dc.titleDirty Work? Policing On-line Indecency in Digital Forensicsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-06-01T14:25:19Z
dc.identifier.issn0007-0955
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Oxford University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of Criminologyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-05-26
exeter.funder::British Academyen_GB
exeter.funder::Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-05-26
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-06-01T12:44:25Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-07-12T14:45:57Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Centre for Crime and Justice Studies (ISTD). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.