Characterizing the performance of a POPS miniaturized optical particle counter when operated on a quadcopter drone
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Z | |
dc.contributor.author | Osborne, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Anderson, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Shutler, JD | |
dc.contributor.author | Wilson, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Langridge, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Yim, SHL | |
dc.contributor.author | Coe, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Babu, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Satheesh, SK | |
dc.contributor.author | Zuidema, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, JCH | |
dc.contributor.author | Haywood, J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-20T07:14:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09-16 | |
dc.description.abstract | We first validate the performance of the Portable Optical Particle Spectrometer (POPS), a small light-weight and high sensitivity optical particle counter, against a reference scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) for a month-long deployment in an environment dominated by biomass burning aerosols. Subsequently, we examine any biases introduced by operating the POPS on a quadcopter drone, a DJI Matrice 200 V2. We report the root mean square difference (RMSD) and mean absolute difference (MAD) in particle number concentrations (PNCs) when mounted on the UAV and operating on the ground and when hovering at 10 m. When wind speeds are low (less than 2.6 m s−1), we find only modest differences in the RMSDs and MADs of 5 % and 3 % when operating at 10 m altitude. When wind speeds are between 2.6 and 7.7 m s−1 the RMSDs and MADs increase to 26.2 % and 19.1 %, respectively, when operating at 10 m altitude. No statistical difference in PNCs was detected when operating on the UAV in either ascent or descent. We also find size distributions of aerosols in the accumulation mode (defined by diameter, d, where 0.1 ≤ d ≤ 1 µm) are relatively consistent between measurements at the surface and measurements at 10 m altitude, while differences in the coarse mode (here defined by d > 1 µm) are universally larger. Our results suggest that the impact of the UAV rotors on the POPS PNCs are small at low wind speeds, but when operating under a higher wind speed of up to 7.6 m s−1, larger discrepancies occur. In addition, it appears that the POPS measures sub-micron aerosol particles more accurately than super-micron aerosol particles when airborne on the UAV. These measurements lay the foundations for determining the magnitude of potential errors that might be introduced into measured aerosol particle size distributions and concentrations owing to the turbulence created by the rotors on the UAV. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Chinese University of Hong Kong | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Exeter | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 14, pp. 6101 - 6118 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5194/amt-14-6101-2021 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NE/L013886/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NE/L013584/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NE/L013878/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/127129 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | European Geosciences Union / Copernicus Publications | en_GB |
dc.rights | © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. | en_GB |
dc.title | Characterizing the performance of a POPS miniaturized optical particle counter when operated on a quadcopter drone | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-20T07:14:38Z | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from European Geosciences Union / Copernicus Publications via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.description | The data presented in this study can be provided upon reasonable request from Zixia Liu (zixia.liu@kcl.ac.uk). | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-07-24 | |
exeter.funder | ::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
exeter.funder | ::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-07-24 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-09-20T07:06:38Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-09-20T07:14:47Z | |
refterms.panel | B | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.