Long-term extreme response of an offshore turbine: How accurate are contour-based estimates?
dc.contributor.author | Haselsteiner, AF | |
dc.contributor.author | Frieling, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Mackay, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Sander, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Thoben, K-D | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-04T10:23:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-09-27 | |
dc.description.abstract | According to design standards, offshore wind turbines need to withstand environmental loads with a return period of 50 years. This work compares the extreme response along the 50-year environmental contour with the true 50-year wind turbine response. It was found that the environmental contour method that is currently described in the IEC design standard for offshore wind turbines can strongly under-predict the 50-year return value of response variables whose annual maxima typically occur during power production. The bias in the contour-based estimate of the 50-year response can be attributed to three sources: (1) the method used to construct the contour; (2) neglecting serial correlation in environmental conditions; and (3) neglecting the short-term variability in the response. In our analysis the 50-year maximum mudline overturning moment was underestimated by 4–8% by the contour-based approach that is currently recommended, whereas the bending moment at 10 m water depth was underestimated by 25–28%. This underestimation was mainly due to ignoring the short-term variability in the response. The bias associated with contour construction, an effect much discussed in recent publications, was of much smaller magnitude. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 181, pp. 945 - 965 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.077 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | EP/S000747/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/127332 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5013306 | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://github.com/ahaselsteiner/2021-extreme-response | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 27 September 2022 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.subject | Offshore wind turbine | en_GB |
dc.subject | Environmental contour method | en_GB |
dc.subject | Reliability | en_GB |
dc.subject | Structural design | en_GB |
dc.subject | Multivariate extremes | en_GB |
dc.title | Long-term extreme response of an offshore turbine: How accurate are contour-based estimates? | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-04T10:23:06Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0960-1481 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data availability: The artificial time series and the results of the multiphysics simulation are available as a Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5013306. The scripts that were used in the analysis of this study are available as a GitHub repository at https://github.com/ahaselsteiner/2021-extreme-response. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Renewable Energy | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-09-18 | |
exeter.funder | ::Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2021-09-27 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2021-10-04T10:20:18Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-09-26T23:00:00Z | |
refterms.panel | B | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/