Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMohammadi, H
dc.contributor.authorChallenor, P
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, D
dc.contributor.authorGoodfellow, M
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-19T08:32:59Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-28
dc.description.abstractIn many real-world applications, we are interested in approximating black-box, costly functions as accurately as possible with the smallest number of function evaluations. A complex computer code is an example of such a function. In this work, a Gaussian process (GP) emulator is used to approximate the output of complex computer code. We consider the problem of extending an initial experiment (set of model runs) sequentially to improve the emulator. A sequential sampling approach based on leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation is proposed that can be easily extended to a batch mode. This is a desirable property since it saves the user time when parallel computing is available. After fitting a GP to training data points, the expected squared LOO (ES-LOO) error is calculated at each design point. ES-LOO is used as a measure to identify important data points. More precisely, when this quantity is large at a point it means that the quality of prediction depends a great deal on that point and adding more samples nearby could improve the accuracy of the GP. As a result, it is reasonable to select the next sample where ES-LOO is maximised. However, ES-LOO is only known at the experimental design and needs to be estimated at unobserved points. To do this, a second GP is fitted to the ES-LOO errors and where the maximum of the modified expected improvement (EI) criterion occurs is chosen as the next sample. EI is a popular acquisition function in Bayesian optimisation and is used to trade-off between local/global search. However, it has a tendency towards exploitation, meaning that its maximum is close to the (current) "best" sample. To avoid clustering, a modified version of EI, called pseudo expected improvement, is employed which is more explorative than EI yet allows us to discover unexplored regions. Our results show that the proposed sampling method is promising.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAlan Turing Instituteen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 10 (1), pp. 294 - 316en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1137/21M1404260
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/N014391/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/127500
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSociety for Industrial and Applied Mathematicsen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
dc.subjectadaptive samplingen_GB
dc.subjectcomputer experimenten_GB
dc.subjectleave-one-out cross-validationen_GB
dc.subjectGaussian processesen_GB
dc.titleCross-validation based adaptive sampling for Gaussian process modelsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-10-19T08:32:59Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2166-2525
dc.identifier.journalSIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantificationen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-10-04
exeter.funder::Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
exeter.funder::Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-10-04
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-10-19T08:24:48Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-03-25T15:36:38Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record