Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRamirez, J
dc.contributor.authorBöhm, S
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-21T10:07:17Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-21
dc.description.abstractIn accordance with critical reflective thinking on colonialisation, we respond to Dunlap’s critical remarks on our article by deconstructing some of the themes presented in the debate on internal colonialism in the context of large-scale wind energy developments in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico. We return to a historical conceptualisation of internal colonialism as it pertains to a continuation of colonial-like dynamics – oppression, repression, violation and exploitation of vulnerable people – within a country, which is important for our discussion on energy justice, particularly cognitive justice, as the colonial-like dynamics of economic transactions between economically motivated indigenous people and private investors with the support of elite actors – which we term transactional colonialism – have repercussions for vulnerable people and indigenous livelihoods. We hope that our perspective will contribute to the global discussion of the socio-ecological impacts of large-scale wind energy developments and green transitions more generally.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 82, article102303en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.erss.2021.102303
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/127536
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectCritical researchen_GB
dc.subjectTransactional colonialismen_GB
dc.subjectIndigenous peopleen_GB
dc.subjectWind energyen_GB
dc.subjectIsthmus of Tehuantepecen_GB
dc.titleFor more pluralistic critiques of colonialism: A response to Dunlapen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-10-21T10:07:17Z
dc.identifier.issn2214-6296
exeter.article-number102303en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalEnergy Research and Social Scienceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-09-09
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-09-21
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-10-21T10:06:08Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-10-21T10:07:25Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).