Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRamirez, J
dc.contributor.authorBöhm, S
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-21T10:11:06Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-13
dc.description.abstractEnergy production is a source of disputes across the world. Governments and firms argue that investing in wind energy contributes to the sustainable development of energy systems. However, wind farms perpetuate ongoing injustices and instigate new injustices. Vulnerable groups such as excluded and marginalised indigenous people can trace the injustices in low-carbon investments to a historical continuity of oppression and repression by internal and external elite groups. Based on a qualitative longitudinal study in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec in Oaxaca, Mexico, we expand our understanding of the energy justice framework in two ways. First, we show that cognitive justice is a vital dimension for understanding different ways of life, traditions and customs. Second, we propose the new concept of ‘transactional colonialism’, which emphasises the role of economic transactions between firms and economically motivated members of indigenous communities with the support of elite actors. This article provides new insights into the conflicting dynamics of wind energy investments in the Global South.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 78, article 102135en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.erss.2021.102135
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/127537
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_GB
dc.rights© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectTransactional colonialismen_GB
dc.subjectEnergy justiceen_GB
dc.subjectCognitive justiceen_GB
dc.subjectIndigenous peopleen_GB
dc.subjectWind energyen_GB
dc.subjectMexicoen_GB
dc.titleTransactional colonialism in wind energy investments: Energy injustices against vulnerable people in the Isthmus of Tehuantepecen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2021-10-21T10:11:06Z
dc.identifier.issn2214-6296
exeter.article-number102135en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Data sharing is not applicable to this article, as the data are confidential.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEnergy Research and Social Scienceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-06-02
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-06-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2021-10-21T10:10:07Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2021-10-21T10:11:16Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).