Twenty-five years of securitization theory: A corpus-based review

Abstract

Twenty-five years after its initial formulation, securitization theory is at a crossroads: attempts to critically scrutinize its achievements and shortcomings have proliferated, concerns about the theory’s eurocentrism are articulated and a heated row has shaken the field following accusations of racism. In this unstable context, this article systematically reviews a corpus of 171 securitization theory papers published in 15 major International Relations journals since 1995, identifying two major imbalances characterizing securitization theory research. First, rich theoretical development has not been matched by sustained efforts to strengthen empirical work; second, the theory has not been globally embraced, displaying instead a narrow, distinctly local anchoring. By shedding light on these two issues and highlighting the relationship between them, this review article aims to provide clear and actionable observations around which scholars could productively re-organize the ongoing debates and controversies.