Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMasquelier, C
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-17T15:40:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-03
dc.date.updated2022-01-17T14:31:57Z
dc.description.abstractSince intersectionality theory constitutes a critical assessment of the way the social world operates and strives for social justice, it entails an image of how the world is and how things could become. In this article a version of intersectionality with particularly strong counter-cultural tendencies is considered. Drawing on Ruth Levitas’ approach to utopia as ‘method,’ it makes explicit pluriversal intersectionality’s utopian content. It is shown that the defining features of this intersectionality theory share an elective affinity with the principle of self-management lying at the core of the libertarian strand of socialist thought. But the utopia whose contours are drawn here is not expected to act as a blueprint. Instead, the article aspires to serve as an invitation to dialogue about the kind of future that could lie beyond intersectional oppression and, consequently, help consolidate pluriversal intersectionality’s transformative potential.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 3 March 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00380261221079115
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128440
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-1850-6731 (Masquelier, Charles)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2022. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage)
dc.subjectpluriversal intersectionalityen_GB
dc.subjectutopiaen_GB
dc.subjectself-managementen_GB
dc.subjectrelationalityen_GB
dc.subjectdialogueen_GB
dc.subjectsocial changeen_GB
dc.titlePluriversal intersectionality, critique and utopiaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-01-17T15:40:22Z
dc.identifier.issn0038-0261
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionAuthor accepted manuscript replaced with published version by Caroline Huxtable on 2022-03-23
dc.identifier.journalSociological Reviewen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-17
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-01-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-01-17T14:32:06Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-03-23T12:06:57Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2022. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2022. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage)