Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPleasants, N
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-01T15:47:51Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-27
dc.date.updated2022-02-01T15:32:17Z
dc.description.abstractMarx is typically and commonsensically seen as the arch moral critic of capitalism. But Allen Wood, in his celebrated but provocative ‘The Marxian critique of justice’, argued that in fact Marx held that capitalism (the capitalist mode of production) is not unjust, and indeed that it is perfectly just. His reasons in support of this attribution issue directly from Marx’s overarching social scientific and historical-cum-philosophical paradigm, ‘historical materialism’. Very few Marxists or exegetes of Marx have been persuaded by Wood’s radical reading of Marx on justice. G A Cohen, for example, dismisses it as an ‘unlikely thesis’. But I will argue that Wood’s ‘anti-injustice’ reading of Marx is essentially sound, though his key arguments for it are hostage to some subverting incoherencies. I go on to proffer a pared-down rendition of the defensible core of Wood’s anti-injustice reading of Marx.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 51 (1), pp. 147 - 177en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/05568641.2022.2052347
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128674
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-3644-4044 (Pleasants, Nigel)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 27 November 2023 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 The Editorial Board, Philosophical Papers. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/  en_GB
dc.subjectMarxen_GB
dc.subjectjusticeen_GB
dc.subjecthistorical materialismen_GB
dc.subjectcapitalismen_GB
dc.titleDid Marx really think that capitalism is unjust?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-02-01T15:47:51Z
dc.identifier.issn1996-8523
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Routledge via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalPhilosophical Papersen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-01-27
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-01-27
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-02-01T15:32:19Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-11-27T00:00:00Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Editorial Board, Philosophical Papers. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/  
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Editorial Board, Philosophical Papers. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/