Did Marx really think that capitalism is unjust?
dc.contributor.author | Pleasants, N | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-01T15:47:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-05-27 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-02-01T15:32:17Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Marx is typically and commonsensically seen as the arch moral critic of capitalism. But Allen Wood, in his celebrated but provocative ‘The Marxian critique of justice’, argued that in fact Marx held that capitalism (the capitalist mode of production) is not unjust, and indeed that it is perfectly just. His reasons in support of this attribution issue directly from Marx’s overarching social scientific and historical-cum-philosophical paradigm, ‘historical materialism’. Very few Marxists or exegetes of Marx have been persuaded by Wood’s radical reading of Marx on justice. G A Cohen, for example, dismisses it as an ‘unlikely thesis’. But I will argue that Wood’s ‘anti-injustice’ reading of Marx is essentially sound, though his key arguments for it are hostage to some subverting incoherencies. I go on to proffer a pared-down rendition of the defensible core of Wood’s anti-injustice reading of Marx. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 51 (1), pp. 147 - 177 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/05568641.2022.2052347 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/128674 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-3644-4044 (Pleasants, Nigel) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Routledge | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Under embargo until 27 November 2023 in compliance with publisher policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Editorial Board, Philosophical Papers. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.subject | Marx | en_GB |
dc.subject | justice | en_GB |
dc.subject | historical materialism | en_GB |
dc.subject | capitalism | en_GB |
dc.title | Did Marx really think that capitalism is unjust? | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-01T15:47:51Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1996-8523 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Routledge via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Philosophical Papers | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-01-27 | |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-01-27 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-02-01T15:32:19Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2023-11-27T00:00:00Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Editorial Board, Philosophical Papers. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/