Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBanducci, S
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-03T13:34:28Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-26
dc.date.updated2022-02-03T11:28:36Z
dc.description.abstractHow does sexism affect women’s pathway to political office? Scholars have claimed that voter sexism is over because women candidates win elections at the same rate as men. However, the emergence of a gender equality backlash, misogynistic social media campaigns and the continued under-representation of women in political office globally, indicate a need to re-examine whether sexism acts as a barrier to women’s representation. To better understand political representation, therefore, it is important to understand how and under which conditions sexism by voters, media and political parties, actual and anticipated, can lead women candidates to alter campaign behavior and strategies. For the proposed programme of research in TWICEASGOOD, we reconceptualize the “gender penalty” faced by women candidates to take into account the sexism, threats of violence that they face online, through social media, in the traditional media and in face-to-face encounters. We aim to understand the extent of these types of sexism as well as the ways in which women candidates anticipate and counter them, by being “twice as good”, in order to achieve electoral success. To better understand how encounters of “everyday sexism” on the campaign trail, both online and offline and in the media, shape women’s campaign efforts and chances at electoral success, we propose an ambitious five-year programme of research that captures candidate experiences of sexism and assesses their impact on electoral outcomes. To capture how sexism is experienced “everyday” on the campaign trail, we used a mixed-methods approach, bringing together participant-observation of candidates on the campaign trail in four countries with quantitative media analysis, candidate surveys and a battery of items administered in Round 11 of the European Social Survey to create a cross-national sexism index. This rich data will generate new insights about the causes of women’s continued under-representation in politics.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commissionen_GB
dc.identifier.citationBanducci, S. 2020. Grant Application: TWICEASGOOD. Twice as Hard, Half as Good? Women Candidates’ Experience of Sexism on the Campaign Trail. Submitted to European Research Advanced Grant: Horizon2020. Grant Agreement 101019284. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10871/128688
dc.identifier.grantnumber101019284en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128688
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-1874-5110 (Banducci, Susan)
dc.rights© 2020en_GB
dc.titleGrant Application: TWICEASGOOD. Twice as Hard, Half as Good? Women Candidates’ Experience of Sexism on the Campaign Trailen_GB
dc.typeOtheren_GB
dc.date.available2022-02-03T13:34:28Z
dc.descriptionGrant application for the ERC Advanced Grant TWICEASGOODen_GB
dc.descriptionThis grant application resulted in the award of a European Research Council grant (101019284) under the Horizon 2020 funding programme. It was awarded as part of the 2020 Advanced Grants competition. The grant funds the "TWICEASGOOD - Twice as Hard, Half as Good? Women Candidates’ Experience of Sexism on the Campaign Trail" project (January 2022 - December 2026).
dc.descriptionPlease cite as: Banducci, S. 2020. Grant Application: TWICEASGOOD. Twice as Hard, Half as Good? Women Candidates’ Experience of Sexism on the Campaign Trail. Submitted to European Research Advanced Grant: Horizon2020. Grant Agreement 101019284. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10871/128688
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-08-26
rioxxterms.typeOtheren_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-02-03T13:32:26Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-02-03T13:34:37Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record