Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThomas, V
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T15:24:23Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-15
dc.date.updated2022-02-11T14:56:26Z
dc.description.abstractEven ‘hands off’ approaches to conservation such as rewilding are intimately, sometimes violently, involved in the lives and deaths of the other-than-human species they seek to protect. Foucauldian biopolitics, with its exploration of the regulation of life and death, is increasing being used to examine the control of other-than-human species. This paper extends the work of other scholars by applying the concept of biopolitics to rewilding in England. A comparative case study of two rewilding sites (the Avalon Marshes in Somerset and Wild Ennerdale in Cumbria) identified common modes of biopolitics operating at both sites. These modes were animals / species as: expendable objects, machines / human proxies, analogues, and self-determining agents, all of which ‘allowed’ different levels of agency for the species concerned. Given that field sites were purposively selected to display contrasting contexts it is possible to extrapolate from the Avalon Marshes and Wild Ennerdale and propose that these biopolitical modes are operating at other English rewilding sites.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 20 (3), pp. 222-233en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/128774
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-4947-3023 (Thomas, Virginia)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherMedknow Publications / Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environmenten_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.conservationandsociety.org.in//text.asp?2022/20/3/222/343327
dc.rights© Thomas 2022. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and distribution of the article, provided the original work is cited. Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow, Mumbai
dc.subjectrewildingen_GB
dc.subjectbiopoliticsen_GB
dc.subjectOther-than-human animalsen_GB
dc.subjectNon-human animalsen_GB
dc.subjectEnglanden_GB
dc.subjectEnglishen_GB
dc.titleThe biopolitics of (English) rewildingen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-02-11T15:24:23Z
dc.identifier.issn0975-3133
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Medknow Publications via the link in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalConservation and Societyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-24
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2021-12-24
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-02-11T14:56:39Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-05-03T14:28:31Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Thomas 2022. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use and distribution of the article, provided the original work is cited. Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow, Mumbai
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Thomas 2022. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and distribution of the article, provided the original work is cited. Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow, Mumbai