The Flexible Modelling Framework for the Met Office Unified Model (Flex-UM, using UM 12.0 release)
dc.contributor.author | Maher, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Earnshaw, P | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-21T13:40:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02-09 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-02-21T12:12:16Z | |
dc.description.abstract | The Met Office Unified Model (UM) is a world-leading atmospheric weather and climate model. In addition to comprehensive simulations of the atmosphere, the UM is capable of running idealised simulations, such as the dry physics Held–Suarez test case, radiative convective equilibrium and simulating planetary atmospheres other than Earth. However, there is a disconnect between the simplicity of the idealised UM model configurations and the full complexity of the UM. This gap inhibits the broad use of climate model hierarchy approaches within the UM. To fill this gap, we have developed the Flexible Modelling Framework for the UM – Flex-UM – which broadens the climate model hierarchy capabilities within the UM. Flex-UM was designed to replicate the atmospheric physics of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) idealised moist physics aqua-planet model. New parameterisations have been implemented in Flex-UM, including simplified schemes for convection, large-scale precipitation, radiation, boundary layer and sea surface temperature (SST) boundary conditions. These idealised parameterisations have been implemented in a modular way, so that each scheme is available for use in any model configuration. This has the advantage that we can incrementally add or remove complexity within the model hierarchy. We compare Flex-UM to ERA5 and aqua-planet simulations using the Isca climate modelling framework (based on the GFDL moist physics aqua-planet model) and comprehensive simulations of the UM (using the GA7.0 configuration). We also use two SST boundary conditions to compare the models (fixed SST and a slab ocean). We find the Flex-UM climatologies are similar to both Isca and GA7.0 (though Flex-UM is generally a little cooler, with higher relative humidity and a less pronounced storm track). Flex-UM has a single Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) in the slab-ocean simulation but a double-ITCZ in the fixed-SST simulation. Further work is needed to ensure that the atmospheric energy budget closes to within 1–2 W m−2, as the current configuration of Flex-UM gains 9–11 W m−2 (the range covers the two SST boundary conditions). Flex-UM greatly extends the modelling hierarchy capabilities of the UM and offers a simplified framework for developing, testing and evaluating parameterisations within the UM. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 1177-1194 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 15(3), pp. 1177-1194 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1177-2022 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NE/N013123/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NE/T003863/1 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/128857 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0001-8513-8700 (Maher, Penelope) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | European Geosciences Union / Copernicus Publications | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/approach/collaboration/unified-model/partnership | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/um/browser | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/roses-u/browser | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5700372 | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5017471 | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5700633 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © Author(s) 2022. Open access. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. | en_GB |
dc.title | The Flexible Modelling Framework for the Met Office Unified Model (Flex-UM, using UM 12.0 release) | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-21T13:40:10Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1991-959X | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from the European Geosciences Union via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Code and data availability: The UM code and its configuration files are subject to Crown Copyright. A licence for the UM can be requested from https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/approach/collaboration/unified-model/partnership (last access: 10 June 2021). The source code for Flex-UM will be available as a branch of the UM in version 12.0 and will be available at https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/um/browser (last access: 5 February 2021) (to access this link, you first need to apply via the link above). The Flex-UM simulations in this study were completed using modifications to UM version 11.7, and the GA7.0 simulations were completed using version 11.6. The simplified Betts–Miller scheme and slab-ocean codes used in this study are already on the UM code trunk in version 11.7 as part of the Trac code management system (see link above). The grey radiation scheme, boundary layer code and large-scale precipitation are currently under review and will be made available as part of the next UM release (version 12.1). The configuration files used in this study are available at https://code.metoffice.gov.uk/trac/roses-u/browser (last access: 5 February 2021) for the following UM suite IDs: Flex-UM fixed-SST (u-cc036), Flex-UM slab ocean (u-cc037), GA7.0 fixed SST (u-cc038) and GA7.0 slab ocean (u-cc039). The model output for Flex-UM and GA7.0 can be downloaded at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5700372 (Maher, 2021a). The Flex-UM and GA7.0 data can also be downloaded directly from the Met Office archive using these suite IDs. The Isca model output can be downloaded at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5017471 (Maher, 2021b). The post-processing and Python scripts used in this paper can be downloaded at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5700633 (Maher, 2021c). | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1991-9603 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Geoscientific Model Development | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Geoscientific Model Development, 15(3) | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-11-23 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-02-09 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-02-21T13:37:21Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-02-21T13:40:26Z | |
refterms.panel | B | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-02-09 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) 2022. Open access. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.