Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFawcett, D
dc.contributor.authorCunliffe, AM
dc.contributor.authorSitch, S
dc.contributor.authorO’Sullivan, M
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, K
dc.contributor.authorBrazier, RE
dc.contributor.authorHill, TC
dc.contributor.authorAnthoni, P
dc.contributor.authorArneth, A
dc.contributor.authorArora, VK
dc.contributor.authorBriggs, PR
dc.contributor.authorGoll, DS
dc.contributor.authorJain, AK
dc.contributor.authorLi, X
dc.contributor.authorLombardozzi, D
dc.contributor.authorNabel, JEMS
dc.contributor.authorPoulter, B
dc.contributor.authorSéférian, R
dc.contributor.authorTian, H
dc.contributor.authorViovy, N
dc.contributor.authorWigneron, J-P
dc.contributor.authorWiltshire, A
dc.contributor.authorZaehle, S
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T10:18:29Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-27
dc.date.updated2022-05-05T08:37:46Z
dc.description.abstractDrylands cover ca. 40% of the land surface and are hypothesised to play a major role in the global carbon cycle, controlling both long-term trends and interannual variation. These insights originate from land surface models (LSMs) that have not been extensively calibrated and evaluated for water-limited ecosystems. We need to learn more about dryland carbon dynamics, particularly as the transitory response and rapid turnover rates of semi-arid systems may limit their function as a carbon sink over multi-decadal scales. We quantified aboveground biomass carbon (AGC; inferred from SMOS L-band vegetation optical depth) and gross primary productivity (GPP; from PML-v2 inferred from MODIS observations) and tested their spatial and temporal correspondence with estimates from the TRENDY ensemble of LSMs. We found strong correspondence in GPP between LSMs and PML-v2 both in spatial patterns (Pearson’s r = 0.9 for TRENDY-mean) and in inter-annual variability, but not in trends. Conversely, for AGC we found lesser correspondence in space (Pearson’s r = 0.75 for TRENDY-mean, strong biases for individual models) and in the magnitude of inter-annual variability compared to satellite retrievals. These disagreements likely arise from limited representation of ecosystem responses to plant water availability, fire, and photodegradation that drive dryland carbon dynamics. We assessed inter-model agreement and drivers of long-term change in carbon stocks over centennial timescales. This analysis suggested that the simulated trend of increasing carbon stocks in drylands is in soils and primarily driven by increased productivity due to CO2 enrichment. However, there is limited empirical evidence of this 50-year sink in dryland soils. Our findings highlight important uncertainties in simulations of dryland ecosystems by current LSMs, suggesting a need for continued model refinements and for greater caution when interpreting LSM estimates with regards to current and future carbon dynamics in drylands and by extension the global carbon cycle.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipESAen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipANR CLAND Convergence Instituteen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union Horizon 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 10, article 790200en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.790200
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/R00062X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/T01279X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber4000123002/18/I-NBen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber101003536en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/129519
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://sites.exeter.ac.uk/trendyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://github.com/gee-hydro/gee_PMLen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5511724en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://earthengine.googlesource.com/users/dfawcett/DRIVING_C_RS_publicationen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 Fawcett, Cunliffe, Sitch, O’Sullivan, Anderson, Brazier, Hill, Anthoni, Arneth, Arora, Briggs, Goll, Jain, Li, Lombardozzi, Nabel, Poulter, Séférian, Tian, Viovy, Wigneron, Wiltshire and Zaehle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_GB
dc.subjectland surface models (LSM)en_GB
dc.subjectdrylands, productivityen_GB
dc.subjectaboveground biomassen_GB
dc.subjectmodel evaluationen_GB
dc.subjectvegetation optical depth (VOD)en_GB
dc.titleAssessing Model Predictions of Carbon Dynamics in Global Drylandsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-05-05T10:18:29Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Frontiers media via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement; The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: The TRENDY-v8 ensemble of simulation outputs is available upon request at https://sites.exeter.ac.uk/trendy. The PML-v2 product script is available online from https://github.com/gee-hydro/gee_PML. The SMOS-IC V2 L-VOD product was provided by Jean-Pierre Wigneron. Processing code is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5511724. Google Earth Engine Repository is available at: https://earthengine.googlesource.com/users/dfawcett/DRIVING_C_RS_publication (requires Google account to access).en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2296-665X
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Environmental Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Environmental Science, 10
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-04-04
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-04-27
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-05-05T10:14:53Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-05-05T10:18:30Z
refterms.panelBen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-04-27


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 Fawcett, Cunliffe, Sitch, O’Sullivan, Anderson, Brazier, Hill, Anthoni, Arneth, Arora, Briggs, Goll, Jain, Li, Lombardozzi, Nabel, Poulter, Séférian, Tian, Viovy, Wigneron, Wiltshire and Zaehle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Fawcett, Cunliffe, Sitch, O’Sullivan, Anderson, Brazier, Hill, Anthoni, Arneth, Arora, Briggs, Goll, Jain, Li, Lombardozzi, Nabel, Poulter, Séférian, Tian, Viovy, Wigneron, Wiltshire and Zaehle. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.