Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChen, Y
dc.contributor.authorHaywood, J
dc.contributor.authorWang, Y
dc.contributor.authorMalavelle, F
dc.contributor.authorJordan, G
dc.contributor.authorPartridge, D
dc.contributor.authorFieldsend, J
dc.contributor.authorDe Leeuw, J
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, A
dc.contributor.authorCho, N
dc.contributor.authorOreopoulos, L
dc.contributor.authorPlatnick, S
dc.contributor.authorGrosvenor, D
dc.contributor.authorField, P
dc.contributor.authorLohmann, U
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-14T09:56:22Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-01
dc.date.updated2022-07-14T07:47:24Z
dc.description.abstractAerosol-cloud interactions have a potentially large impact on climate, but are poorly quantified and thus contribute a significant and long-standing uncertainty in climate projections. The impacts derived from climate models are poorly constrained by observations, because retrieving robust large-scale signals of aerosol-cloud interactions are frequently hampered by the considerable noise associated with meteorological co-variability. The Iceland-Holuhraun effusive eruption in 2014 resulted in a massive aerosol plume in an otherwise near-pristine environment and thus provided an ideal natural experiment to quantify cloud responses to aerosol perturbations. Here we disentangle significant signals from the noise of meteorological co-variability using a satellite-based machine-learning approach. Our analysis shows that aerosols from the eruption increased cloud cover by approximately 10%, and this appears to be the leading cause of climate forcing, rather than cloud brightening as previously thought. We find that volcanic aerosols do brighten clouds by reducing droplet size, but this has a significantly smaller radiative impact than changes in cloud fraction. These results add substantial observational constraints on the cooling impact of aerosols. Such constraints are critical for improving climate models, which still inadequately represent the complex macro-physical and micro-physical impacts of aerosol-cloud interactions.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union Horizon 2020en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUK BEIS/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programmeen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipETH Zurich Foundationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNASAen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 15, pp. 609–614en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41561-022-00991-6
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01027-9
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/T006897/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber820829en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberGA01101en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2021-HS-332en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/S00436X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/130263
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-2143-6634 (Haywood, James)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherNature Researchen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.goven_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://cds.climate.copernicus.euen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 1 February 2023 in compliance with publisher policy en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2022
dc.titleMachine learning reveals climate forcing from aerosols is dominated by increased cloud coveren_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-07-14T09:56:22Z
dc.identifier.issn1752-0894
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Nature Research via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The MODIS cloud and aerosol products from Aqua (MYD08_L3) and Terra (MOD08_L3) used in this study are available from the Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System Distributed Active Archive Center of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (LAADS-DAAC, NASA), https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov. ERA5 datasets are available from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) archive, https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu. The full datasets shown in the figures are provided in source data files.en_GB
dc.descriptionA correction to this article was published on 17 August 2022 at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01027-9: "Correction to: Nature Geoscience https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00991-6, published online 1 August 2022. In the version of this article originally published, extraneous “(%)” symbols appeared in three x-axis labels in Fig. 2c. They have now been removed from the HTML and PDF versions of the figure".
dc.identifier.journalNature Geoscienceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-06-14
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-06-14
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-07-14T07:47:29Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record