Study protocol for evaluation of aid to diagnosis for developmental dysplasia of the hip in general practice: controlled trial randomised by practice
dc.contributor.author | Roposch, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Warsame, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Chater, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Green, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Hunter, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Wood, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Freemantle, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Nazareth, I | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-26T09:30:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12-02 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-07-26T09:02:26Z | |
dc.description.abstract | INTRODUCTION: In the UK, a compulsory '6-week hip check' is performed in primary care for the detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, missed diagnoses and infants incorrectly labelled with DDH remain a problem, potentially leading to adverse consequences for infants, their families and the National Health Service. National policy states that infants should be referred to hospital if the 6-week check suggests DDH, though there is no available tool to aid examination or offer guidelines for referral. We developed standardised diagnostic criteria for DDH, based on international Delphi consensus, and a 9-item checklist that has the potential to enable non-experts to diagnose DDH in a manner approaching that of experts. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a controlled trial randomised by practice that will compare a diagnostic aid against standard care for the hip check. The primary objective is to determine whether an aid to the diagnosis of DDH reduces the number of clinically insignificant referrals from primary care to hospital and the number of late diagnosed DDH. The trial will include a qualitative process evaluation, an assessment of professional behavioural change and a full health economic evaluation. We will recruit 152 general practitioner practices in England. These will be randomised to conduct the hip checks with use of the study diagnostic aid and/or as per usual practice. The total number of infants seen during a 15-month recruitment period will be 110 per practice. Two years after the 6-week hip check, we will measure the number of referred infants that are (1) clinically insignificant for DDH and (2) those that constitute appropriate referrals. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has approval from the Health Research Authority (16/1/2020) and the Confidentiality Advisory Group (18/2/2020). Results will be published in peer-reviewed academic journals, disseminated to patient organisations and the media. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04101903; Pre-results. | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | e041837- | |
dc.format.medium | Electronic | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 10(12), article e041837 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041837 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/130383 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-2315-5326 (Green, Judith) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33268429 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | en_GB |
dc.title | Study protocol for evaluation of aid to diagnosis for developmental dysplasia of the hip in general practice: controlled trial randomised by practice | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-26T09:30:39Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2044-6055 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2044-6055 | |
dc.identifier.journal | BMJ Open | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMJ Open, 10(12) | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-11-21 | |
dc.rights.license | CC BY | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-12-02 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-07-26T09:28:43Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-07-26T09:30:40Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2020-12-02 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.