Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLittleton, EW
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, A
dc.contributor.authorHarper, AB
dc.contributor.authorHastings, AFS
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, NE
dc.contributor.authorDoelman, J
dc.contributor.authorvan Vuuren, DP
dc.contributor.authorLenton, TM
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-28T13:39:52Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-13
dc.date.updated2022-07-28T13:07:05Z
dc.description.abstractLarge-scale bioenergy plays a key role in climate change mitigation scenarios, but its efficacy is uncertain. This study aims to quantify that uncertainty by contrasting the results of three different types of models under the same mitigation scenario (RCP2.6-SSP2), consistent with a 2 °C temperature target. This analysis focuses on a single bioenergy feedstock, Miscanthus x giganteus, and contrasts projections for its yields and environmental effects from: an integrated assessment model (IMAGE), a land surface and dynamic global vegetation model tailored to Miscanthus bioenergy (JULES) and a bioenergy crop model (MiscanFor). Under the present climate, JULES, IMAGE and MiscanFor capture the observed magnitude and variability in Miscanthus yields across Europe; yet in the tropics JULES and IMAGE predict high yields, whereas MiscanFor predicts widespread drought-related diebacks. 2040-49 projections show there is a rapid scale up of over 200 Mha bioenergy cropping area in the tropics. Resulting biomass yield ranges from 12 (MiscanFor) to 39 (JULES) Gt dry matter over that decade. Change in soil carbon ranges from +0.7 Pg C (MiscanFor) to -2.8 Pg C (JULES), depending on preceding land cover and soil carbon.2090-99 projections show large-scale biomass energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is projected in Europe. The models agree that <2 °C global warming will increase yields in the higher latitudes, but drought stress in the Mediterranean region could produce low yields (MiscanFor), and significant losses of soil carbon (JULES, IMAGE). These results highlight the uncertainty in rapidly scaling-up biomass energy supply, especially in dry tropical climates and in regions where future climate change could result in drier conditions. This has important policy implications – because prominently-used scenarios to limit warming to “well below 2 °C” (including the one explored here) depend upon its effectiveness.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUKRIen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union Horizon 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 13 June 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12982
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/P019951/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/S029575/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/M019691/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber10100353en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/130438
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-5576-5498 (Littleton, Emma W)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-6725-7498 (Lenton, Timothy M)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2022. Open access under a Creative Commons licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.titleUncertain effectiveness of Miscanthus bioenergy expansion for climate change mitigation explored using land surface, agronomic and integrated assessment modelsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-07-28T13:39:52Z
dc.identifier.issn1757-1693
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1757-1707
dc.identifier.journalGCB Bioenergyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-06-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-07-28T13:36:17Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-07-28T13:39:53Z
refterms.panelBen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-06-13


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record