A Chemostat Model for Evolution by Persistence: Clade Selection and its Explanatory Autonomy
dc.contributor.author | Neto, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Doolittle, WF | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-25T09:58:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-04-25 | |
dc.date.updated | 2022-10-25T09:01:21Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Many contemporary biologists and philosophers of biology admit that selection occurs at any level of the biological hierarchy at which entities showing heritable variation in fitness are found, while insisting that fitness at any level entails differential reproduction, not differential persistence. Those who allow that persistence can be selected doubt that selection on non-reproducing entities can be reiterated, to produce “complex adaptations”. We present here a verbal model of sub-clones evolving in a simple idealized chemostat that calls into question these suppositions and is usefully explanatory when taken as an analogy to selection for persistence of clades. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | New Frontiers in Research Fund | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Published online 25 April 2022 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.11 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | GBMF9729 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | NFRFE 201900703 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/131424 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) / Philosophy of Science Association | en_GB |
dc.rights | © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Philosophy of Science Association. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.subject | persistence | en_GB |
dc.subject | clades | en_GB |
dc.subject | multilevel selection | en_GB |
dc.subject | model | en_GB |
dc.subject | adaptation | en_GB |
dc.title | A Chemostat Model for Evolution by Persistence: Clade Selection and its Explanatory Autonomy | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-25T09:58:13Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0270-8647 | |
dc.description | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1539-767X | |
dc.identifier.journal | Philosophy of Science | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Philosophy of Science | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
rioxxterms.version | AM | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2022-04-25 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2022-10-25T09:56:22Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2022-10-25T09:58:18Z | |
refterms.panel | C | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2022-04-25 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Philosophy of Science Association. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/