Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMilano, S
dc.contributor.authorPerea, A
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-09T11:58:37Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-22
dc.date.updated2022-12-09T11:42:56Z
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we explore the absentminded driver problem using two different scenarios. In the first scenario we assume that the driver is capable of reasoning about his degree of absentmindedness before he hits the highway. This leads to a Savage-style model where the states are mutually exclusive and the act-state independence is in place. In the second we employ centred possibilities, by modelling the states (i.e. the events about which the driver is uncertain) as the possible final destinations indexed by a time period. The optimal probability we find for continuing at an exit is different from almost all papers in the literature. In this scenario, act-state independence is still violated, but states are mutually exclusive and the driver arrives at his optimal choice probability via Bayesian updating. We show that our solution is the only one guaranteeing immunity from sure loss via a Dutch strategy, and that -- despite initial appearances -- it is time consistent.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 22 February 2023en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0266267122000360
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/131987
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-9643-4222 (Milano, Silvia)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
dc.subjectAbsent-minded driver problemen_GB
dc.subjectBayesian updatingen_GB
dc.subjectAct-state independenceen_GB
dc.subjectTime consistencyen_GB
dc.subjectDutch strategyen_GB
dc.titleRational updating at the crossroadsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-12-09T11:58:37Z
dc.identifier.issn0266-2671
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on on open access from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1474-0028
dc.identifier.journalEconomics and Philosophyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-12-07
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-06-24
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-12-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-12-09T11:42:59Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-04-05T15:05:29Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.