Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShields, BM
dc.contributor.authorDennis, JM
dc.contributor.authorAngwin, CD
dc.contributor.authorWarren, F
dc.contributor.authorHenley, WE
dc.contributor.authorFarmer, AJ
dc.contributor.authorSattar, N
dc.contributor.authorHolman, RR
dc.contributor.authorJones, AG
dc.contributor.authorPearson, ER
dc.contributor.authorHattersley, AT
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-13T14:00:33Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-07
dc.date.updated2022-12-13T13:23:31Z
dc.description.abstractPrecision medicine aims to treat an individual based on their clinical characteristics. A differential drug response, critical to using these features for therapy selection, has never been examined directly in type 2 diabetes. In this study, we tested two hypotheses: (1) individuals with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2, compared to BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2, have greater glucose lowering with thiazolidinediones than with DPP4 inhibitors, and (2) individuals with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 60-90 ml/min/1.73 m2, compared to eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2, have greater glucose lowering with DPP4 inhibitors than with SGLT2 inhibitors. The primary endpoint for both hypotheses was the achieved HbA1c difference between strata for the two drugs. In total, 525 people with type 2 diabetes participated in this UK-based randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover trial of 16 weeks of treatment with each of sitagliptin 100 mg once daily, canagliflozin 100 mg once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg once daily added to metformin alone or metformin plus sulfonylurea. Overall, the achieved HbA1c was similar for the three drugs: pioglitazone 59.6 mmol/mol, sitagliptin 60.0 mmol/mol and canagliflozin 60.6 mmol/mol (P = 0.2). Participants with BMI > 30 kg/m2, compared to BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2, had a 2.88 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.98, 4.79) lower HbA1c on pioglitazone than on sitagliptin (n = 356, P = 0.003). Participants with eGFR 60-90 ml/min/1.73 m2, compared to eGFR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2, had a 2.90 mmol/mol (95% CI: 1.19, 4.61) lower HbA1c on sitagliptin than on canagliflozin (n = 342, P = 0.001). There were 2,201 adverse events reported, and 447/525 (85%) randomized participants experienced an adverse event on at least one of the study drugs. In this precision medicine trial in type 2 diabetes, our findings support the use of simple, routinely available clinical measures to identify the drug class most likely to deliver the greatest glycemic reduction for a given patient. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02653209 ; ISRCTN registration: 12039221 .).en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMedical Research Council (MRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.format.extent1-8
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 7 December 2022en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02120-7
dc.identifier.grantnumberMR/N00633X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132018
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-3785-327X (Shields, Beverley M)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-7171-732X (Dennis, John M)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-0935-5284 (Angwin, Catherine D)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-0883-7599 (Jones, Angus G)
dc.identifierScopusID: 7407101887 (Jones, Angus G)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-5620-473X (Hattersley, Andrew T)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherNature Researchen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477733en_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) under exclusive license to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2022. For the purpose of open access, the corresponding author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.en_GB
dc.titlePatient stratification for determining optimal second-line and third-line therapy for type 2 diabetes: the TriMaster studyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-12-13T14:00:33Z
dc.identifier.issn1078-8956
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Nature Research via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: To minimize the risk of patient re-identification, de-identified individual patient-level clinical data are available under restricted access. Requests for access to anonymized individual participant data and study documents should be made to the corresponding author and will be reviewed by the Peninsula Research Bank Steering Committee. Access to data through the Peninsula Research Bank will be granted for requests with scientifically valid questions by academic teams with the necessary skills appropriate for the research. Data that can be shared will be released with the relevant transfer agreement.en_GB
dc.descriptionCode availability: Requests for access to code should be made to the corresponding author and will be reviewed by the Peninsula Research Bank Steering Committee. Access to code through the Peninsula Research Bank will be granted for requests with scientifically valid questions by academic teams with the necessary skills appropriate for the research. Code will be released by the lead statistician.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1546-170X
dc.identifier.journalNature Medicineen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofNat Med
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-11-07
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-12-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-12-13T13:56:55Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2022-12-13T14:00:34Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-12-07


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) under exclusive license to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2022. For the purpose of open access, the corresponding author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) under exclusive license to Springer Nature America, Inc. 2022. For the purpose of open access, the corresponding author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.