Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHorvath, L
dc.contributor.authorBanducci, S
dc.contributor.authorBlamire, J
dc.contributor.authorDegnen, C
dc.contributor.authorJames, O
dc.contributor.authorJones, A
dc.contributor.authorStevens, D
dc.contributor.authorTyler, K
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-16T14:10:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-17
dc.date.updated2022-12-16T12:09:25Z
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To identify the key individual-level (demographics, attitudes, mobility) and contextual (COVID-19 case numbers, tiers of mobility restrictions, urban districts) determinants of adopting the NHS COVID-19 contact tracing app and continued use overtime. DESIGN AND SETTING: A three-wave panel survey conducted in England in July 2020 (background survey), November 2020 (first measure of app adoption) and March 2021 (continued use of app and new adopters) linked with official data. PARTICIPANTS: N=2500 adults living in England, representative of England's population in terms of regional distribution, age and gender (2011 census). PRIMARY OUTCOME: Repeated measures of self-reported app usage. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multilevel logistic regression linking a range of individual level (from survey) and contextual (from linked data) determinants to app usage. RESULTS: We observe initial app uptake at 41%, 95% CI (0.39% to 0.43%), and a 12% drop-out rate by March 2021, 95% CI (0.10% to 0.14%). We also found that 7% of nonusers as of wave 2 became new adopters by wave 3, 95% CI (0.05% to 0.08%). Initial uptake (or failure to use) of the app associated with social norms, privacy concerns and misinformation about third-party data access, with those living in postal districts with restrictions on mobility less likely to use the app. Perceived lack of transparent evidence of effectiveness was associated with drop-out of use. In addition, those who trusted the government were more likely to adopt in wave 3 as new adopters. CONCLUSIONS: Successful uptake of the contact tracing app should be evaluated within the wider context of the UK Government's response to the crisis. Trust in government is key to adoption of the app in wave 3 while continued use is linked to perceptions of transparent evidence. Providing clear information to address privacy concerns could increase uptake, however, the disparities in continued use among ethnic minority participants needs further investigation.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.format.extente053327-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.identifier.citationVol. 12, article e053327en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053327
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/V006320/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132046
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-1874-5110 (Banducci, Susan)
dc.identifierScopusID: 6602733599 (Banducci, Susan)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-6031-2581 (James, Oliver)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-7562-5270 (Tyler, Katharine)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35039293en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14527188.V.1en_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.titleAdoption and continued use of mobile contact tracing technology: multilevel explanations from a three-wave panel survey and linked dataen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2022-12-16T14:10:19Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
exeter.article-numberARTN e053327
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Data are available in a public, open access repository. The questionnaires, case summaries, as well as replication data are available on figshare: Stevens D, Banducci S, Horvath L, Jones A. Identity, Inequality, and the Media in Brexit-COVID-19-Britain Surveys, Waves 1–3. figshare; 2021 (cited 9 May 2021). https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14527188.V.1en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open, 12(1)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-23
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-01-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2022-12-16T14:08:08Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2022-12-16T14:10:22Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-01-17


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. 
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/