Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, B
dc.contributor.authorPeri-Rotem, N
dc.contributor.authorMountford-Zimdars, A
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-05T13:35:04Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-25
dc.date.updated2023-01-05T12:14:08Z
dc.description.abstractIt is estimated that one in seven couples in the UK experience infertility, though just over half of those affected by it seek professional help. Previous studies pointed to potential socioeconomic barriers in accessing assisted reproduction, however, less is known about geographic accessibility to fertility treatment and the way it is associated with measures of deprivation. In this study, we used publicly available data on fertility clinics, combined with official statistics for 315 local authorities in England, to create a standardized measure of geographic accessibility to fertility services. In addition, using a negative binomial regression model, we estimated the link between socioeconomic measures at the local authority level and availability of fertility services. We found that geographic accessibility to assisted reproduction is significantly higher in the most advantaged local authorities in terms of average household income and level of deprivation. This may lead to reduced opportunities for realizing fertility aspirations among those suffering from infertility in more deprived areas. Taking into account both socioeconomic and geographic barriers to accessing fertility treatment can contribute to a better understanding of help-seeking patterns for infertility, likelihood of achieving a live birth and inform policy to equalise opportunities in access to infertility treatment.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 25 March 2023en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/14647273.2023.2190040
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/132153
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-5828-9693 (Peri-Rotem, Nitzan)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis / British Fertility Societyen_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.en_GB
dc.subjectIVFen_GB
dc.subjectgeographic accessibilityen_GB
dc.subjectassisted reproductionen_GB
dc.subjectdeprivationen_GB
dc.subjectinfertilityen_GB
dc.subjectfertility treatmenten_GB
dc.titleGeographic opportunities for assisted reproduction: A study of regional variations in access to fertility treatment in Englanden_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-01-05T13:35:04Z
dc.identifier.issn1742-8149
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Taylor & Francis via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalHuman Fertilityen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Fertility
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-12-13
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-02-03
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-12-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-01-05T12:14:12Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-04-06T14:15:32Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.