Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, PC
dc.contributor.authorBoeke, RC
dc.contributor.authorBoisvert, LN
dc.contributor.authorFeldl, N
dc.contributor.authorHenry, M
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Y
dc.contributor.authorLangen, PL
dc.contributor.authorLiu, W
dc.contributor.authorPithan, F
dc.contributor.authorSejas, SA
dc.contributor.authorTan, I
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-07T09:24:34Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-09
dc.date.updated2023-06-06T14:55:57Z
dc.description.abstractArctic amplification (AA) is a coupled atmosphere-sea ice-ocean process. This understanding has evolved from the early concept of AA, as a consequence of snow-ice line progressions, through more than a century of research that has clarified the relevant processes and driving mechanisms of AA. The predictions made by early modeling studies, namely the fall/winter maximum, bottom-heavy structure, the prominence of surface albedo feedback, and the importance of stable stratification have withstood the scrutiny of multi-decadal observations and more complex models. Yet, the uncertainty in Arctic climate projections is larger than in any other region of the planet, making the assessment of high-impact, near-term regional changes difficult or impossible. Reducing this large spread in Arctic climate projections requires a quantitative process understanding. This manuscript aims to build such an understanding by synthesizing current knowledge of AA and to produce a set of recommendations to guide future research. It briefly reviews the history of AA science, summarizes observed Arctic changes, discusses modeling approaches and feedback diagnostics, and assesses the current understanding of the most relevant feedbacks to AA. These sections culminate in a conceptual model of the fundamental physical mechanisms causing AA and a collection of recommendations to accelerate progress towards reduced uncertainty in Arctic climate projections. Our conceptual model highlights the need to account for local feedback and remote process interactions within the context of the annual cycle to constrain projected AA. We recommend raising the priority of Arctic climate sensitivity research, improving the accuracy of Arctic surface energy budget observations, rethinking climate feedback definitions, coordinating new model experiments and intercomparisons, and further investigating the role of episodic variability in AA.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNASAen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUS National Science foundationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAlfred P. Sloan Foundationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 9, article 758361en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.758361
dc.identifier.grantnumberNNH19ZDA001N-IDSen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberRGPIN-2021-02720en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNSF AGS-1753034en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberAGS-2053121en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/T00942X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/133307
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-4498-6476 (Henry, Matthew)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 Taylor, Boeke, Boisvert, Feldl, Henry, Huang, Langen, Liu, Pithan, Sejas and Tan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_GB
dc.subjectarctic amplificationen_GB
dc.subjectclimate feedback mechanismsen_GB
dc.subjectcloud feedbacken_GB
dc.subjectsea ice albedo feedbacken_GB
dc.subjectremote mechanismsen_GB
dc.subjectsea iceen_GB
dc.titleProcess Drivers, Inter-Model Spread, and the Path Forward: A Review of Amplified Arctic Warmingen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-06-07T09:24:34Z
dc.identifier.issn2296-6463
exeter.article-numberARTN 758361
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2296-6463
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Earth Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Earth Science, 9
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2021-12-20
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-02-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-06-07T09:21:29Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-06-07T09:24:38Z
refterms.panelBen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2022-02-09


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 Taylor, Boeke, Boisvert, Feldl, Henry, Huang, Langen, Liu, Pithan, Sejas and Tan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 Taylor, Boeke, Boisvert, Feldl, Henry, Huang, Langen, Liu, Pithan, Sejas and Tan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.