Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBardsley, S
dc.contributor.authorCriner, GJ
dc.contributor.authorHalpin, DMG
dc.contributor.authorHan, MK
dc.contributor.authorHanania, NA
dc.contributor.authorHill, D
dc.contributor.authorLange, P
dc.contributor.authorLipson, DA
dc.contributor.authorMartinez, FJ
dc.contributor.authorMidwinter, D
dc.contributor.authorSiler, TM
dc.contributor.authorSingh, D
dc.contributor.authorWise, RA
dc.contributor.authorvan Zyl-Smit, RN
dc.contributor.authorBerkman, N
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-20T14:12:01Z
dc.date.issued2022-11-11
dc.date.updated2023-06-20T08:46:48Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Smoking is the major risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In IMPACT, single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) triple therapy significantly reduced moderate/severe exacerbation rates and improved lung function and health status versus FF/VI or UMEC/VI in COPD patients. This post hoc analysis investigated trial outcomes by smoking status. METHODS: IMPACT was a double-blind, 52-week trial. Patients aged ≥40 years with symptomatic COPD and ≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in the prior year were randomized 2:2:1 to FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 μg, FF/VI 100/25 μg, or UMEC/VI 62.5/25 μg. Endpoints assessed by smoking status at screening included rate and risk of moderate/severe exacerbations, change from baseline in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score at Week 52. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 10,355 patients in the intent-to-treat population, 3,587 (35%) were current smokers. FF/UMEC/VI significantly reduced on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation rates versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI in current (rate ratio 0.85 [95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.95]; P = 0.003 and 0.86 [0.76-0.98]; P = 0.021) and former smokers (0.85 [0.78-0.91]; P < 0.001 and 0.70 [0.64-0.77]; P < 0.001). FF/UMEC/VI significantly reduced time-to-first on-treatment moderate/severe exacerbation versus FF/VI and UMEC/VI in former smokers, and versus FF/VI in current smokers. Similar trends were seen for lung function and health status. Former smokers receiving inhaled corticosteroid-containing therapy had higher pneumonia incidence than current smokers. CONCLUSIONS: FF/UMEC/VI improved clinical outcomes versus dual therapy regardless of smoking status. Benefits of FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI were greatest in former smokers, potentially due to relative corticosteroid resistance in current smokers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: GSK (CTT116855/NCT02164513).en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGlaxoSmithKleinen_GB
dc.format.extent107040-
dc.identifier.citationVol. 205, article 107040en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2022.107040
dc.identifier.grantnumberCTT116855en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNCT02164513en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/133437
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-2009-4406 (Halpin, David MG)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36470149en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.comen_GB
dc.rights© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.titleSingle-inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol versus dual therapy in current and former smokers with COPD: IMPACT trial post hoc analysisen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-06-20T14:12:01Z
dc.identifier.issn0954-6111
exeter.article-number107040
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionData sharing: Anonymized individual participant data and study documents can be requested for further research from www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1532-3064
dc.identifier.journalRespiratory Medicineen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-11-07
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2022-11-11
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-06-20T14:07:43Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-06-20T14:12:06Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-11-11


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).