Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenham-Clarke, SR
dc.contributor.authorEwing, J
dc.contributor.authorBarlow, A
dc.contributor.authorNewlove-Delgado, T
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-29T10:39:28Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-19
dc.date.updated2023-11-29T10:01:45Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Relationships in various forms are an important source of meaning in people’s lives that can beneft their health, wellbeing and happiness. Relationship distress is associated with public health problems such as alcohol misuse, obesity, poor mental health, and child poverty, whilst safe, stable, and nurturing relationships are potential protective factors. Despite increased emphasis on Relationship Education in schools, little is known about the views of relationship professionals on relationship education specifcally, and how this contrasts with the views of young people (YP). This Wellcome Centre for the Cultures and Environments of Health funded Beacon project seeks to fll this gap by exploring their perspectives and inform the future development of relationship education. Methods: We conducted focus groups with YP (n=4) and interviews with relationship professionals (n=10). The data was then thematically analysed. Results: Themes from YP focus groups included: ‘Good and bad relationships’; ‘Learning about relationships’; ‘the role of schools’ and ‘Beyond Relationship Education’. Themes from interviews with relationship professionals included: ‘essential qualities of healthy relationships’; ‘how YP learn to relate’ and ‘the role of Relationship Education in schools’. Conclusions: YP and relationship professionals recognised the importance of building YP’s relational capability in schools with a healthy relationship with oneself at its foundation. Relationship professionals emphasised the need for a developmental approach, stressing the need for fexibility, adaptability, commitment and resilience to maintain relationships over the life course. YP often presented dichotomous views, such as relationships being either good or bad relationships, and perceived a link between relationships and mental health. Although not the focus of current curriculum guidance, managing relationship breakdowns and relationship transitions through the life course were viewed as important with an emphasis on building relational skills. This research suggests that schools need improved Relationship Education support, including specialist expertise and resources, and guidance on signposting YP to external sources of help. There is also potential for positive relationship behaviours being modelled and integrated throughout curriculums and refected in a school’s ethos. Future research should explore co-development, evaluation and implementation of Relationship Education programmes with a range of stakeholders.en_GB
dc.format.extents369-s369
dc.identifier.citationVol. 66, No. S1, pp. s369-s369en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.801
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/134685
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-6053-9804 (Benham-Clarke, SR)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-5192-3724 (Newlove-Delgado, T)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectRelationshipen_GB
dc.subjectEducationen_GB
dc.subjectCurriculumen_GB
dc.subjectRomanticen_GB
dc.subjectTeachersen_GB
dc.subjectSchoolen_GB
dc.subjectMental healthen_GB
dc.subjectWell-beingen_GB
dc.subjectPublic healthen_GB
dc.subjectYoung peopleen_GB
dc.titleLearning how relationships work: a thematic analysis of young people and relationship professionals’ perspectives on relationships and relationship educationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-11-29T10:39:28Z
dc.identifier.issn0924-9338
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1778-3585
dc.identifier.journalEuropean Psychiatryen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Psychiatry, 66(Suppl 1)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-07-19
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-11-29T10:29:27Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2023-11-29T10:40:26Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-07-19


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.