Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGilbert, KG
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-04T14:38:03Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-04
dc.date.updated2023-12-04T13:03:19Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Students starting medical school generally come from a learning background that expects them to learn content, which is reproduced to pass an exam. As a part of their learning development, they must adapt and become self-motivated learners who can determine the underlying principles or concepts and use these to problem solve in the uncertainty of real-life clinical practice. Whilst much has been written about designing curricula to promote learning development, there is no one-size fits all approach to facilitating this type of learning, thus an analysis of what helps and hinders learning development is indicated. Methods: Student pairs in Y2 and Y3 of an undergraduate Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (BMBS) programme of a South-West UK medical school, were asked to audio record a conversation about their learning through a facilitated problem-based learning approach during the BMBS course so far. They were provided with a brief to aid them in their discussion in the style of the outside broadcast method of BBC Radio 4s listening project. Using this method, the conversation was unfacilitated and allowed to take its natural course. Conversations were transcribed and coded to determine emerging themes with respect to the developing understanding of the students about what and how they were learning. Results: Four student pairs volunteered for the project one from Y2 and three from Y3. Five key themes were identified including: from ‘learning it all, to structured learning’; ‘developing understanding and the spiral curriculum’; ‘working alone versus working with others’; ‘integrated learning and understanding context’ and ‘assessment and resources.’ Narrative analysis within these themes suggested that over the course of the first two to three years of study, participants developed a better understanding of how best to learn, although there were differences in both time and order that participants reached a point where learning felt more natural to them. Discussion: Analysis of the data suggested that students develop independently towards being self-motivated lifelong learners. There were several key aspects of curriculum design that could be used to facilitate this development, which could easily be incorporated into developing or creating problem- / enquiry-based curricula.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 8, article 1244039en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1244039
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/134726
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-3431-7845 (Gilbert, Kerry)
dc.identifierScopusID: 7102447400 (Gilbert, Kerry)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_GB
dc.rights© 2023 Gilbert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_GB
dc.subjectlearning journeysen_GB
dc.subjectproblem-based learningen_GB
dc.subjectmedical educationen_GB
dc.subjectnarrative analysisen_GB
dc.subjectthematic analysis (TA)en_GB
dc.subjectlistening projecten_GB
dc.subjectconversations about learningen_GB
dc.subjectunderstanding learningen_GB
dc.titleLearning journeys – student learning development in the first years of a medical degree: an analysis of student conversationsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2023-12-04T14:38:03Z
dc.identifier.issn2297-7775
exeter.article-number1244039
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Frontiers Media via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Anonymised raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2297-7775
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Sociologyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Sociology, 8
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-11-07
dcterms.dateSubmitted2023-06-22
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-12-04
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2023-12-04T13:03:22Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2023-12-04T14:38:07Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-12-04


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 Gilbert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 Gilbert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.