Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnkeny, RA
dc.contributor.authorLeonelli, S
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T11:49:34Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-20
dc.date.updated2024-01-29T08:58:26Z
dc.description.abstractQualitative research provides rigorous methods not only for investigating behavioral or social issues, but can also be used for exploring epistemic issues related to science and its practices. There is growing scholarly awareness that important aspects of science can be best understood through qualitative analyses and cannot be captured using more traditional textual sources such as publications or archival documents or via more quantitative or formalized methodologies such as citation analysis or bibliometrics. Reflecting on our own research on the philosophy of scientific practices, particularly on the role of model organisms in biology, we discuss some of the challenges associated with the design and conduct of qualitative research in the philosophy of science. We then explore three issues in more detail: the extent to which qualitative methods support the identification of media and spaces for the study of epistemic questions in science; the investigation of social structures particularly relevant to scientific practices and reasoning; and the conceptual and interpretative significance of analytic choices in empirical research on science. In closing, we reflect on the value of qualitative research methods for understanding scientific practices as ways to identify novel research directions, refine and augment philosophically motivated research questions, investigate the rationales and procedures through which particular scientific choices become ingrained in research, and question the implications of such habits as norms for what counts as ‘best practice’ in particular scientific fields, all of which are topics that deserve more attention from philosophers and other scholars interested in scientific practices.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAustralian Research Council (ARC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union Horizon 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 11 (2), pp. 247 - 262en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/qup0000289
dc.identifier.grantnumberDP160102989en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber101001145en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/135187
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-7815-6609 (Leonelli, Sabina)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_GB
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_GB
dc.subjectphilosophy of scientific practicesen_GB
dc.subjectscientific reasoningen_GB
dc.subjectepistemologyen_GB
dc.subjectstudy designen_GB
dc.titleInvestigating research practices: How qualitative methods enhance philosophical understandings of scienceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-01-29T11:49:34Z
dc.identifier.issn2326-3601
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from the American Psychological Association via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.description© 2024. Open access. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). This license permits copying and redistributing the work in any medium or format, as well as adapting the material for any purpose, even commercially
dc.identifier.eissn2326-3601
dc.identifier.journalQualitative Psychologyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-01-26
dcterms.dateSubmitted2023-12-12
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-01-26
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-01-29T08:58:28Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-19T14:07:31Z
refterms.panelDen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-01-26


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record