Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, HF
dc.contributor.authorHartley, S
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-09T08:28:37Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-28
dc.date.updated2024-09-06T15:13:01Z
dc.description.abstractDigital livestock technologies (DLTs) are presented as solutions to grand challenges in post-Brexit British agricultural policy, such as climate change and food security. Evidence suggests technological solutions to agricultural challenges will be more effective with stakeholder and public engagement, yet there is little known about stakeholder views on these emerging technologies. We drew on responsible research and innovation, to analyse stakeholder perspectives on three case studies of DLT development through anticipatory focus groups with expert stakeholders in British animal agriculture. We found that stakeholders from broadly agroecological approaches to farming are at risk of exclusion from DLT development and policy, with negative implications for the ability of DLTs to resolve grand challenges in animal agriculture. We propose a heuristic framework of purpose, practicality and effects as key considerations for inclusive and responsible DLT development that contributes to ensuring effective solutions to grand challenges while avoiding wasted investments.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 28 August 2024en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12492
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/T022566/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/137356
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-6381-7638 (Williamson, HF)
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-4849-5685 (Hartley, S)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Sociologia Ruralis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Rural Sociology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly citeden_GB
dc.subjectagri-techen_GB
dc.subjectanimal agricultureen_GB
dc.subjectdataen_GB
dc.subjectdigital technologyen_GB
dc.subjectinclusionen_GB
dc.subjectresponsible innovationen_GB
dc.titleResponsible development of digital livestock technologies for agricultural challenges: Purpose, practicality and effects are key considerationsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-09-09T08:28:37Z
dc.identifier.issn0038-0199
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The author has provided the required Data Availability Statement, and if applicable, included functional and accurate links to said data therein.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1467-9523
dc.identifier.journalSociologia Ruralisen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofSociologia Ruralis
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-08-13
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-08-28
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-09-09T08:23:17Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-09-09T08:28:47Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-08-28
exeter.rights-retention-statementNo


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024 The Author(s). Sociologia Ruralis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Rural Sociology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024 The Author(s). Sociologia Ruralis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society for Rural Sociology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited