Percentage Predicted Peak Oxygen Consumption in People With Fontan Circulation: A Rapid Systematic Scoping Review and Validation Study
dc.contributor.author | Wadey, CA | |
dc.contributor.author | Tomlinson, OW | |
dc.contributor.author | Barker, AR | |
dc.contributor.author | Stuart, AG | |
dc.contributor.author | Tran, DL | |
dc.contributor.author | Laohachai, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Ayer, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Weintraub, RG | |
dc.contributor.author | Cordina, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, CA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-26T13:08:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-08-27 | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-09-26T10:41:45Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Peak oxygen consumption (peak VȮ 2) is routinely measured in people who have congenital heart disease and is reported as a percentage of predicted value, based upon age- and sex-matched normative reference values (NRVs). This study aimed to identify which NRVs are being used, assess whether NRVs are being applied appropriately, and evaluate if recommended NRVs are valid when applied to people with congenital heart disease. Methods and results: A systematic scoping review identified studies that reported peak VȮ 2 percentage of predicted value in people with congenital heart disease. A modified risk of bias tool evaluated the included studies. Forty-five studies reported peak VȮ 2 percentage of predicted value, and only 21 (47%) studies described or provided a reference on how their percentage of predicted value was calculated. The most cited NRVs were from Wasserman (n=12) and Cooper and Weiler-Ravell (n=7). Risk of bias analysis judged 63% of studies as having some concerns. The NRVs recommended by the American Heart Association were applied to participants with a Fontan circulation (n=70; aged 26.5±6.4years; 59% women) to examine validity. Predicted peak VȮ 2 values from the Wasserman NRV was not significantly associated to measured peak VȮ 2 values (men: b=0.31, R2≤0.01; women: b=0.07, R2=0.02). Conclusions: Numerous NRVs have been applied to individuals with congenital heart disease and are often poorly reported and inappropriately matched to participants. The Wasserman NRV was the most cited but showed poor validity when applied to a Fontan cohort. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Canon Medical Systems UK Ltd. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Exeter | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Medical Research Future Fund | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 13 (17), article e034035 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.034035 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | ARGCHDG000016 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/137552 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-3275-7975 (Wadey, Curtis A) | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-4063-7682 (Tomlinson, Owen W) | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0001-8610-5417 (Barker, Alan R) | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-1740-6248 (Williams, Craig A) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wiley / American Heart Association | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39189612 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2024 The Author(s). Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. | en_GB |
dc.subject | Cardiorespiratory fitness | en_GB |
dc.subject | Congenital heart disease | en_GB |
dc.subject | CPET | en_GB |
dc.title | Percentage Predicted Peak Oxygen Consumption in People With Fontan Circulation: A Rapid Systematic Scoping Review and Validation Study | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-26T13:08:37Z | |
exeter.article-number | e034035 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2047-9980 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease (JAHA) | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-06-05 | |
dcterms.dateSubmitted | 2024-01-18 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2024-08-27 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2024-09-26T11:53:48Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2024-09-26T13:08:42Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2024-08-27 | |
exeter.rights-retention-statement | No |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024 The Author(s). Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.