Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOrlandi, F
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-04T13:07:07Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-30
dc.date.updated2024-10-30T18:09:05Z
dc.description.abstractTaking inspiration from the epistemological potential of the Aymara concept of taypi this contribution aims to show the persistence of Indigenous peoples' self-determination and community governance in contemporary heritage politics. A multisited archaeological ethnography across Tiwanaku (Bolivia) and the Calchaquí valleys (Tucumán, Argentina) brings to light the long memories of anti-colonial resistance in the southcentral Andes and visualizes heritage-making practices in their ecological dimension, bridging multiple temporalities and territorial relatedness. The resulting picture figures a deep-seated tension between regulatory policies that adjust indigenous heritage to universal classifications and values embedded in the modern nation-state imaginaries, and emancipatory politics in which heritage claims are entangled with the social reproduction of community life and with the reparation of historical injustices. This twofold political dimension materializes in the legal artefact of the free, prior, informed consultation (FPIC), whose long memory of ambiguity is traced down to the early day of colonization. The article argues that consent-seeking mechanisms create an intermediate space where universal and place-based worldmaking designs converge. Locating these grey areas in time and space is crucial for addressing intercultural histories and future-oriented practices of heritage rights.en_GB
dc.format.extent17-30
dc.identifier.citationVol. 19, No. 2, pp. 17-30en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1353/fta.2022.a940802
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/137898
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0003-1844-7196 (Orlandi, Francesco)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Minnesota Pressen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 30 October 2025 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2024 University of Minnesota Press. This article was published as Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation History, Theory, and Criticism, vol. 19 no. 2, pp. 17-30, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/fta.2022.a940802. No part of this article may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, transmitted, or distributed, in any form, by any means, electronic, mechanical, photographic, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the University of Minnesota Press.en_GB
dc.titleIndigenous heritage and ontological conflicts in the Southcentral Andesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-11-04T13:07:07Z
dc.identifier.issn1549-9715
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from University of Minnesota Press via the DOI in this record en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1934-6026
dc.identifier.journalFuture Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation History, Theory, and Criticismen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-03-26
dcterms.dateSubmitted2022-01-31
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-10-30
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-10-30T18:09:30Z
refterms.versionFCDP
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-10-30
exeter.rights-retention-statementOpt out


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record