Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarnfield, M
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, J
dc.contributor.authorStoeckel, F
dc.contributor.authorMérola, V
dc.contributor.authorStöckli, S
dc.contributor.authorLyons, B
dc.contributor.authorThompson, J
dc.contributor.authorSzewach, P
dc.contributor.authorReifler, J
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-09T08:51:11Z
dc.date.issued2025-05-08
dc.date.updated2025-05-09T05:08:15Z
dc.description.abstractWhen making uncertain judgments about the political future, people consistently see desired outcomes as more likely. But when major events reduce uncertainty about what is possible in the future, how do people's expectations respond? In a panel study conducted during the 2021 German federal election, we find that citizens' predictions of likely coalitions converge after the election takes place, but even after this convergence those expectations remain marked by significant partisan gaps. The election result substantially reduces uncertainty about coalition formation—decreasing, but far from eliminating, differences in expectations between groups with different preferences. Our findings provide a clear case of static wishful thinking (contemporaneous association between preferences and expectations) without dynamic wishful thinking (divergence over time in expectations in line with preferences), suggesting that citizens' expectations of the future, regardless of their prior commitments, respond accordingly to events, but wishful thinking persists even in contexts of dramatically reduced uncertainty.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipHorizon Europe 2020 Programmeen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Academyen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.format.extent102940-102940
dc.identifier.citationVol. 95, article 102940en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2025.102940
dc.identifier.grantnumber682758en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberPFSS23∖230040en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/X007367/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/140934
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://osf.io/4umzv/en_GB
dc.rights© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).en_GB
dc.subjectExpectationsen_GB
dc.subjectUpdatingen_GB
dc.subjectCoalitionsen_GB
dc.subjectWishful thinkingen_GB
dc.titleWishful thinking in response to events: Evidence from the 2021 German federal electionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2025-05-09T08:51:11Z
dc.identifier.issn0261-3794
exeter.article-number102940
dc.date.dateSubmitted30 August 2024
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: Data and code to reproduce all analyses are available on OSF: https://osf.io/4umzv/en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1873-6890
dc.identifier.journalElectoral Studiesen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofElectoral Studies, 95
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-04-25
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2025-05-08
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2025-05-09T08:46:09Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2025-05-09T08:51:39Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2025-05-08


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).