Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Tom
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-24T15:59:22Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-22
dc.description.abstractI argue that one's responsibility for one's emotions has a twofold structure: one bears direct responsibility for emotions insofar as they are the upshot of first-order evaluative judgements concerning reasons of fit; and one bears derivative responsibility for them insofar as they are consequences of activities of emotional self-regulation, which can reflect one's take on second-order reasons concerning the strategic, prudential, or moral desirability of undergoing a particular emotion in a particular context.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 18 (3), pp. 487-500
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10677-014-9535-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/15737
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/10677en_GB
dc.subjectEmotion
dc.subjectResponsibility
dc.subjectRegulation
dc.subjectReasons
dc.titleEmotional Regulation and Responsibilityen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2014-10-24T15:59:22Z
dc.identifier.issn1386-2820
dc.descriptionThis is the author's accepted manuscript, please cite the published version which is available on the Springer web site by following the DOI link above.
dc.identifier.journalEthical Theory and Moral Practiceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record