Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVaughan-Williams, N
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Daniel P.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-24T16:46:57Z
dc.date.issued2014-06-23
dc.description.abstractCitizens are now central to national security strategies, yet governments readily admit that little is known about public opinion on security. This article presents a unique and timely examination of public perceptions of security threats. By focusing on the breadth of security threats that citizens identify, their psychological origins, how they vary from personal to global levels, and the relationships between perceptions of threats and other political attitudes and behaviours, the article makes several new contributions to the literature. These include extending the levels at which threats are perceived from the national versus personal dichotomy to a continuum spanning the individual, family, community, nation and globe, and showing the extent to which perceptions of threat at each level have different causes, as well as different effects on political attitudes and behaviour. These findings are also relevant to policy communities’ understanding of what it means for a public to feel secure.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipESRCen_GB
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Political Science, 2016, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp.149-175
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0007123414000143
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/J004596/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/15928
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCUPen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9289282&fileId=S0007123414000143en_GB
dc.subjectsecurityen_GB
dc.subjectcitizenshipen_GB
dc.subject9/11en_GB
dc.titleCitizens and Security Threats: Issues, Perceptions, and Consequences Beyond the National Frameen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2014-11-24T16:46:57Z
dc.descriptionpublication-status: Accepteden_GB
dc.descriptiontypes: Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionThe version of the article that has been accepted for publication in the journal. Cambridge University Press takes permanent responsibility for the article. Content and layout follow Cambridge University Press’s submission requirements. This version may have been revised following peer review but may be subject to further editorial input by Cambridge University Press.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of Political Scienceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record