dc.contributor.author | Müller-Wille, S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-23T14:16:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-01-13 | |
dc.description.abstract | The historiography of race is usually framed by two discontinuities: the invention of race by European naturalists and anthropologists, marked by Carl Linnaeus’s (1735) Systema naturae and the demise of racial typologies after World War II (WWII) in favor of population-based studies of human diversity. This framing serves a similar function as the quotation marks that almost invariably surround the term. “Race” is placed outside of rational discourse as a residue of outdated essentialist and hierarchical thinking. I will throw doubt on this underlying assumption, not in order to re-legitimate race but in order to understand better why race has been, and continues to be, such a politically powerful and explosive concept. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 39, Issue 4, pp. 597 - 606 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0162243913517759 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/16098 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | http://sth.sagepub.com/content/39/4/597.abstract | en_GB |
dc.subject | epistemology | en_GB |
dc.subject | cultures and ethnicities | en_GB |
dc.subject | other | en_GB |
dc.title | Race and History: Comments from an Epistemological Point of View | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-23T14:16:40Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0162-2439 | |
dc.description | Author's accepted version. Please cite the published version available from the Sage web site by following the DOI link above. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Science Technology and Human Values | en_GB |