Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMüller-Wille, S
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-23T14:16:40Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-13
dc.description.abstractThe historiography of race is usually framed by two discontinuities: the invention of race by European naturalists and anthropologists, marked by Carl Linnaeus’s (1735) Systema naturae and the demise of racial typologies after World War II (WWII) in favor of population-based studies of human diversity. This framing serves a similar function as the quotation marks that almost invariably surround the term. “Race” is placed outside of rational discourse as a residue of outdated essentialist and hierarchical thinking. I will throw doubt on this underlying assumption, not in order to re-legitimate race but in order to understand better why race has been, and continues to be, such a politically powerful and explosive concept.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 39, Issue 4, pp. 597 - 606en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0162243913517759
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16098
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://sth.sagepub.com/content/39/4/597.abstracten_GB
dc.subjectepistemologyen_GB
dc.subjectcultures and ethnicitiesen_GB
dc.subjectotheren_GB
dc.titleRace and History: Comments from an Epistemological Point of Viewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2014-12-23T14:16:40Z
dc.identifier.issn0162-2439
dc.descriptionAuthor's accepted version. Please cite the published version available from the Sage web site by following the DOI link above.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalScience Technology and Human Valuesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record