dc.contributor.author | Hauskeller, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-01-12T13:49:46Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-06-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | This is a critique of Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu’s argument in support of a possible future neuromodulation of love and love-related relationships. I argue that, contrary to what is suggested by Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu, we do have good reason to be concerned about that possibility as well as about the medicalization of love that its pursuit would bring about. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 361 - 365 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S096318011400067X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/16148 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en_GB |
dc.title | Clipping the Angel's Wings: Why the Medicalization of Love May Still Be Worrying | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2015-01-12T13:49:46Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0963-1801 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics | en_GB |