Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHauskeller, Michael
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-12T13:49:46Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-10
dc.description.abstractThis is a critique of Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu’s argument in support of a possible future neuromodulation of love and love-related relationships. I argue that, contrary to what is suggested by Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu, we do have good reason to be concerned about that possibility as well as about the medicalization of love that its pursuit would bring about.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 24, Issue 3, pp. 361 - 365en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S096318011400067X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16148
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.titleClipping the Angel's Wings: Why the Medicalization of Love May Still Be Worryingen_GB
dc.date.available2015-01-12T13:49:46Z
dc.identifier.issn0963-1801
dc.identifier.journalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethicsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record