Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBezuidenhout, Louise Martha
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-04T09:38:14Z
dc.date.issued2014-02-09
dc.description.abstractResponsibility within life science research is a highly scrutinised field. Increasingly, scientists are presented with a range of duties and expectations regarding their conduct within the research setting. In many cases, these duties are presented deontologically, forgoing extensive discussion on how these are practically implemented into the minutiae of daily research practices. This de-contextualized duty has proven problematic when it comes to practical issues of compliance, however it is not often considered as a fundamental aspect of building ethics discourse. This paper examines this issue in detail, particularly focusing on how differences in the contrasts between the ideal and real physical research environments cause conceptual problems for scientists and retard ethical engagement. Such issues are particularly pertinent in low- and middle-income countries. This paper combines theoretical and empirical analyses using the concept of "dual-use" as a focalizing topic. The data show that the research environment acts as an intimate component in the interpretation and implementation of ethical actions.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 21, pp. 51 - 73en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11948-013-9506-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16317
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringeren_GB
dc.subjectLife science ethics
dc.subjectEmpirical ethics
dc.subjectBioethics
dc.subjectResearch environments
dc.subjectLow- and middle-income countries
dc.subjectEthics pedagogy
dc.subjectAfrica
dc.titleEthics in the Minutiae: Examining the Role of the Physical Laboratory Environment in Ethical Discourseen_GB
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.available2015-02-04T09:38:14Z
dc.identifier.issn1353-3452
dc.identifier.journalScience and Engineering Ethicsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record