Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuffenach, A.
dc.contributor.authorLavraud, B.
dc.contributor.authorFarrugia, Charles J.
dc.contributor.authorDemoulin, P.
dc.contributor.authorDasso, S.
dc.contributor.authorOwens, M.J.
dc.contributor.authorSauvaud, J.A.
dc.contributor.authorRouillard, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorLynnyk, A.
dc.contributor.authorFoullon, Claire
dc.contributor.authorSavani, N.P.
dc.contributor.authorLuhmann, J.G.
dc.contributor.authorGalvin, A.B.
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-13T10:23:44Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractSeveral recent studies suggest that magnetic reconnection is able to erode substantial amounts of the outer magnetic flux of interplanetary magnetic clouds (MCs) as they propagate in the heliosphere. We quantify and provide a broader context to this process, starting from 263 tabulated interplanetary coronal mass ejections, including MCs, observed over a time period covering 17 years and at a distance of 1 AU from the Sun with Wind (1995–2008) and the two STEREO (2009–2012) spacecraft. Based on several quality factors, including careful determination of the MC boundaries and main magnetic flux rope axes, an analysis of the azimuthal flux imbalance expected from erosion by magnetic reconnection was performed on a subset of 50 MCs. The results suggest that MCs may be eroded at the front or at rear and in similar proportions, with a significant average erosion of about 40% of the total azimuthal magnetic flux. We also searched for in situ signatures of magnetic reconnection causing erosion at the front and rear boundaries of these MCs. Nearly ~30% of the selected MC boundaries show reconnection signatures. Given that observations were acquired only at 1 AU and that MCs are large-scale structures, this finding is also consistent with the idea that erosion is a common process. Finally, we studied potential correlations between the amount of eroded azimuthal magnetic flux and various parameters such as local magnetic shear, Alfvén speed, and leading and trailing ambient solar wind speeds. However, no significant correlations were found, suggesting that the locally observed parameters at 1 AU are not likely to be representative of the conditions that prevailed during the erosion which occurred during propagation from the Sun to 1 AU. Future heliospheric missions, and in particular Solar Orbiter or Solar Probe Plus, will be fully geared to answer such questions.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNASAen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean FP7 HELCATS projecten_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 120 (1), pp. 43 - 60en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/2014JA020628
dc.identifier.grantnumberNNX10AQ29Gen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNNX13AP39Gen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberSTEREO-FARSIDEen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16526
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2014JA020628en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher policy
dc.subjectcoronal mass ejectionen_GB
dc.subjectmagnetic clouden_GB
dc.subjectmagnetic flux ropeen_GB
dc.subjectsolar winden_GB
dc.subjectmagnetic reconnectionen_GB
dc.titleStatistical study of magnetic cloud erosion by magnetic reconnectionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
pubs.declined2016-02-23T20:12:23.880+0000
pubs.deleted2016-02-23T20:12:23.938+0000
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2014 American Geophysical Unionen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2169-9402
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Geophysical Research A: Space Physicsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record